Last Update: May. 20, 2019, 5:16 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo 145 and Audi TT

What is Better Alfa Romeo 145 or Audi TT?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo 145 Audi TT

7 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo 145

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 83 mm vs 82.5 mm 1% or 0.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 131 g/mile vs 133 g/mile 2% or 2 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 320 liters vs 290 liters 9% or 30 liters
More maximum trunk space 1130 liters vs 700 liters 38% or 430 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 61 liters vs 60 liters 2% or 1 liters
Other specs
Less weight 1275 kg vs 1450 kg 14% or 175 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
More seats 5 vs 4 1

12 reasons to buy Audi TT

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 5 vs 4 1 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Piston stroke longer 92.8 mm vs 91 mm 2% or 1.8 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

340 bhp vs 150 bhp

250 kw. vs 110 kw.

56% or 190 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 450 nM vs 186 nM 59% or 264 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 4.6 sec. vs 8.4 sec. 3.8 sec.
More top speed 155 mph vs 130 mph 25 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 31.01 mpg vs 32.11 mpg 4% or 1.1 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 40.97 mpg vs 42.22 mpg 3% or 1.25 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 21.49 mpg vs 22.61 mpg 5% or 1.12 mpg
Emissions
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 2 3 generations
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.7 meters vs 110 meters 928% or 99.3 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo 145 vs. Audi TT

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6200 RPM vs 5400 RPM 13% or 800 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1970 cm3 vs 2480 cm3 21% or 510 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 6 1 less
Dimensions
Length 4093 mm vs 4198 mm 3% or 105 mm shorter
Width 1712 mm vs 1842 mm 7% or 130 mm narrower
Height 1427 mm vs 1342 mm 6% or 85 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2540 mm vs 2468 mm 3% or 72 mm more
Front tires size 195/55 VR15 vs 245/40 R18
Rear tires size 195/55 VR15 vs 245/40 R18
Spare wheel 195/55 VR15 vs mobile system for tire maintenance
Type of wheels 15" alloy wheels vs 18" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)