Last Update: Mar. 25, 2019, 5:57 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo 145 and Citroen C-Crosser

What is Better Alfa Romeo 145 or Citroen C-Crosser?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo 145 Citroen C-Crosser

8 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo 145

Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 8.4 sec. vs 9.9 sec. 1.5 sec.
More top speed 130 mph vs 124 mph 6 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 32.11 mpg vs 40.41 mpg 26% or 8.3 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 42.22 mpg vs 47.87 mpg 13% or 5.65 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 22.61 mpg vs 31.38 mpg 39% or 8.77 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 320 liters vs 184 liters 43% or 136 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 61 liters vs 60 liters 2% or 1 liters
Other specs
Less weight 1275 kg vs 1750 kg 37% or 475 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

11 reasons to buy Citroen C-Crosser

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 85 mm vs 83 mm 2% or 2 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 96 mm vs 91 mm 5% or 5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

156 bhp vs 150 bhp

115 kw. vs 110 kw.

4% or 6 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 380 nM vs 186 nM 51% or 194 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 115 g/mile vs 131 g/mile 14% or 16 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 2 3 generations
Weight and capacity
More maximum trunk space 1686 liters vs 1130 liters 33% or 556 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2000 kg vs 1200 kg 40% or 800 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.6 meters vs 110 meters 938% or 99.4 meters
More seats 7 vs 5 2

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo 145 vs. Citroen C-Crosser

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6200 RPM vs 4000 RPM 35% or 2200 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1970 cm3 vs 2179 cm3 10% or 209 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 6 1 less
Dimensions
Length 4093 mm vs 4645 mm 12% or 552 mm shorter
Width 1712 mm vs 1805 mm 5% or 93 mm narrower
Height 1427 mm vs 1670 mm 15% or 243 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2540 mm vs 2672 mm 5% or 132 mm less
Front tires size 195/55 VR15 vs 215/70 R16
Rear tires size 195/55 VR15 vs 215/70 R16
Spare wheel 195/55 VR15 vs Compact
Type of wheels 15" alloy wheels vs 16" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)