Last Update: Mar. 22, 2019, 5:39 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo 145 and Citroen Nemo Multispace

What is Better Alfa Romeo 145 or Citroen Nemo Multispace?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo 145 Citroen Nemo Multispace

9 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo 145

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 4 vs 1 3 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
Piston diameter larger 83 mm vs 69.6 mm 16% or 13.4 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 91 mm vs 82 mm 10% or 9 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

150 bhp vs 75 bhp

110 kw. vs 55 kw.

50% or 75 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 32.11 mpg vs 65.74 mpg 105% or 33.63 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 42.22 mpg vs 74.21 mpg 76% or 31.99 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 22.61 mpg vs 55.4 mpg 145% or 32.79 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 61 liters vs 45 liters 26% or 16 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1200 kg vs 1000 kg 17% or 200 kg

9 reasons to buy Citroen Nemo Multispace

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.6 vs 10 43% or 7.6 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
More torque 190 nM vs 186 nM 2% or 4 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 70 g/mile vs 131 g/mile 87% or 61 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 2 3 generations
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 360 liters vs 320 liters 11% or 40 liters
More maximum trunk space 2500 liters vs 1130 liters 55% or 1370 liters
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
Other specs
Less weight 1090 kg vs 1275 kg 17% or 185 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 9.95 meters vs 110 meters 1006% or 100.05 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo 145 vs. Citroen Nemo Multispace

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6200 RPM vs 4000 RPM 35% or 2200 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1970 cm3 vs 1248 cm3 37% or 722 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4093 mm vs 3959 mm 3% or 134 mm shorter
Width 1712 mm vs 1816 mm 6% or 104 mm narrower
Height 1427 mm vs 1721 mm 17% or 294 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2540 mm vs 2513 mm 1% or 27 mm more
Front tires size 195/55 VR15 vs 185/65 R15
Rear tires size 195/55 VR15 vs 185/65 R15
Spare wheel 195/55 VR15 vs 185/65 R15
Type of wheels 15" alloy wheels vs 15" steel
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)