Last Update: Mar. 20, 2019, 5:04 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo 145 and Ford Puma

What is Better Alfa Romeo 145 or Ford Puma?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo 145 Ford Puma

14 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo 145

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 83 mm vs 78 mm 6% or 5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 91 mm vs 83.5 mm 8% or 7.5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

150 bhp vs 125 bhp

110 kw. vs 92 kw.

17% or 25 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 186 nM vs 157 nM 16% or 29 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 8.4 sec. vs 9.2 sec. 0.8 sec.
More top speed 130 mph vs 126 mph 4 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 32.11 mpg vs 38.19 mpg 19% or 6.08 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 42.22 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 10% or 4.05 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 22.61 mpg vs 29.1 mpg 29% or 6.49 mpg
Weight and capacity
More maximum trunk space 1130 liters vs 240 liters 79% or 890 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 61 liters vs 40 liters 34% or 21 liters
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 8 years vs 6 years 25% or 2 years
More painted surfaces warranty 3 years vs 1 years 67% or 2 years
Other specs
More seats 5 vs 4 1

6 reasons to buy Ford Puma

Engine and transmission
Better compression 10.3 vs 10 3% or 0.3 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 111 g/mile vs 131 g/mile 18% or 20 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 3 vs EURO 2 1 generation
Less CO emissions 0 g/mile vs 1 g/mile 0% or 1 g/mile
Other specs
Less weight 1038 kg vs 1275 kg 23% or 237 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10 meters vs 110 meters 1000% or 100 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo 145 vs. Ford Puma

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6200 RPM vs 6300 RPM 2% or 100 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1970 cm3 vs 1679 cm3 15% or 291 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection vs Fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4093 mm vs 3984 mm 3% or 109 mm shorter
Width 1712 mm vs 1674 mm 2% or 38 mm wider
Height 1427 mm vs 1344 mm 6% or 83 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2540 mm vs 2446 mm 4% or 94 mm more
Front tires size 195/55 VR15 vs 195/50 VRX15
Rear tires size 195/55 VR15 vs 195/50 VRX15
Spare wheel 195/55 VR15 vs 195/50 VRX15 steel
Type of wheels 15" alloy wheels vs 6X15" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)