Last Update: Mar. 18, 2019, 5:01 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo 145 and Mitsubishi Colt

What is Better Alfa Romeo 145 or Mitsubishi Colt?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo 145 Mitsubishi Colt

11 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo 145

Engine and transmission
Better compression 10 vs 9 10% or 1 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 83 mm vs 75.5 mm 9% or 7.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 91 mm vs 82 mm 10% or 9 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

150 bhp vs 147 bhp

110 kw. vs 110 kw.

2% or 3 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 32.11 mpg vs 42.83 mpg 33% or 10.72 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 42.22 mpg vs 51.42 mpg 22% or 9.2 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 22.61 mpg vs 33.19 mpg 47% or 10.58 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 320 liters vs 160 liters 50% or 160 liters
More maximum trunk space 1130 liters vs 568 liters 50% or 562 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 61 liters vs 47 liters 23% or 14 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1200 kg vs 750 kg 38% or 450 kg

9 reasons to buy Mitsubishi Colt

Engine and transmission
More torque 210 nM vs 186 nM 11% or 24 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.4 sec. vs 8.4 sec. 1 sec.
More top speed 131 mph vs 130 mph 1 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 95 g/mile vs 131 g/mile 38% or 36 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 2 3 generations
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1060 kg vs 1275 kg 20% or 215 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.2 meters vs 110 meters 978% or 99.8 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo 145 vs. Mitsubishi Colt

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6200 RPM vs 6000 RPM 3% or 200 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1970 cm3 vs 1468 cm3 25% or 502 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4093 mm vs 3880 mm 5% or 213 mm shorter
Width 1712 mm vs 1695 mm 1% or 17 mm wider
Height 1427 mm vs 1520 mm 6% or 93 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2540 mm vs 2500 mm 2% or 40 mm more
Front tires size 195/55 VR15 vs 205/45 R16
Rear tires size 195/55 VR15 vs 205/45 R16
Spare wheel 195/55 VR15 vs Compact
Type of wheels 15" alloy wheels vs 16" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)