Last Update: May. 23, 2019, 5:10 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo 145 and Peugeot 807

What is Better Alfa Romeo 145 or Peugeot 807?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo 145 Peugeot 807

9 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo 145

Engine and transmission
Piston stroke longer 91 mm vs 88 mm 3% or 3 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

150 bhp vs 120 bhp

110 kw. vs 88 kw.

20% or 30 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 8.4 sec. vs 12.9 sec. 4.5 sec.
More top speed 130 mph vs 111 mph 19 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 32.11 mpg vs 42.83 mpg 33% or 10.72 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 42.22 mpg vs 52.33 mpg 24% or 10.11 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 22.61 mpg vs 32.51 mpg 44% or 9.9 mpg
Emissions
Less noise level 74 dB vs 74.6 dB 1% or 0.59999999999999 dB
Other specs
Less weight 1275 kg vs 1811 kg 42% or 536 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

12 reasons to buy Peugeot 807

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 85 mm vs 83 mm 2% or 2 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More torque 300 nM vs 186 nM 38% or 114 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 109 g/mile vs 131 g/mile 20% or 22 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 2 2 generations
Less CO emissions 0 g/mile vs 1 g/mile 0% or 1 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 324 liters vs 320 liters 1% or 4 liters
More maximum trunk space 2948 liters vs 1130 liters 62% or 1818 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 80 liters vs 61 liters 24% or 19 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1800 kg vs 1200 kg 33% or 600 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
Other specs
Less turning radius 11.2 meters vs 110 meters 882% or 98.8 meters
More seats 7 vs 5 2

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo 145 vs. Peugeot 807

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6200 RPM vs 4000 RPM 35% or 2200 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1970 cm3 vs 1997 cm3 1% or 27 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 6 1 less
Dimensions
Length 4093 mm vs 4727 mm 13% or 634 mm shorter
Width 1712 mm vs 1850 mm 7% or 138 mm narrower
Height 1427 mm vs 1759 mm 19% or 332 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2540 mm vs 2823 mm 10% or 283 mm less
Front tires size 195/55 VR15 vs 215/60 R16
Rear tires size 195/55 VR15 vs 215/60 R16
Spare wheel 195/55 VR15 vs 215/60 R16
Type of wheels 15" alloy wheels vs 16" steel
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)