Last Update: Mar. 19, 2019, 5:24 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo 145 and Renault Laguna

What is Better Alfa Romeo 145 or Renault Laguna?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo 145 Renault Laguna

8 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo 145

Engine and transmission
Better compression 10 vs 9.0 10% or 1 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 83 mm vs 82.7 mm 0% or 0.3 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 32.11 mpg vs 35.28 mpg 10% or 3.17 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 42.22 mpg vs 43.38 mpg 3% or 1.16 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 22.61 mpg vs 26.11 mpg 15% or 3.5 mpg
Weight and capacity
More maximum trunk space 1130 liters vs 873 liters 23% or 257 liters
Other specs
Less weight 1275 kg vs 1428 kg 12% or 153 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
More seats 5 vs 4 1

11 reasons to buy Renault Laguna

Engine and transmission
Piston stroke longer 93 mm vs 91 mm 2% or 2 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

205 bhp vs 150 bhp

150 kw. vs 110 kw.

27% or 55 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 300 nM vs 186 nM 38% or 114 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.8 sec. vs 8.4 sec. 0.6 sec.
More top speed 144 mph vs 130 mph 14 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 115 g/mile vs 131 g/mile 14% or 16 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 2 3 generations
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 423 liters vs 320 liters 24% or 103 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 66 liters vs 61 liters 8% or 5 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1500 kg vs 1200 kg 20% or 300 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 99441 miles vs 62150 miles 38% or 37291 miles

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo 145 vs. Renault Laguna

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6200 RPM vs 5000 RPM 19% or 1200 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1970 cm3 vs 1998 cm3 1% or 28 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection vs Fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 6 1 less
Dimensions
Length 4093 mm vs 4643 mm 12% or 550 mm shorter
Width 1712 mm vs 1812 mm 6% or 100 mm narrower
Height 1427 mm vs 1398 mm 2% or 29 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2540 mm vs 2694 mm 6% or 154 mm less
Front tires size 195/55 VR15 vs 225/45 R18
Rear tires size 195/55 VR15 vs 225/45 R18
Spare wheel 195/55 VR15 vs kit for wheel pumping
Type of wheels 15" alloy wheels vs 18" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)