Last Update: Mar. 25, 2019, 5:57 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo 145 and Renault Scenic

What is Better Alfa Romeo 145 or Renault Scenic?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo 145 Renault Scenic

11 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo 145

Engine and transmission
Better compression 10 vs 9.1 9% or 0.9 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 83 mm vs 78 mm 6% or 5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 91 mm vs 73.1 mm 20% or 17.9 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

150 bhp vs 130 bhp

110 kw. vs 96 kw.

13% or 20 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 8.4 sec. vs 10.5 sec. 2.1 sec.
More top speed 130 mph vs 118 mph 12 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 32.11 mpg vs 38.69 mpg 20% or 6.58 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 42.22 mpg vs 47.87 mpg 13% or 5.65 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 22.61 mpg vs 28.82 mpg 27% or 6.21 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 61 liters vs 60 liters 2% or 1 liters
Other specs
Less weight 1275 kg vs 1320 kg 4% or 45 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

8 reasons to buy Renault Scenic

Engine and transmission
More torque 190 nM vs 186 nM 2% or 4 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 104 g/mile vs 131 g/mile 26% or 27 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 2 3 generations
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 437 liters vs 320 liters 27% or 117 liters
More maximum trunk space 1637 liters vs 1130 liters 31% or 507 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1300 kg vs 1200 kg 8% or 100 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
Other specs
Less turning radius 11.05 meters vs 110 meters 895% or 98.95 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo 145 vs. Renault Scenic

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6200 RPM vs 5500 RPM 11% or 700 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1970 cm3 vs 1397 cm3 29% or 573 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection vs Fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 6 1 less
Dimensions
Length 4093 mm vs 4344 mm 6% or 251 mm shorter
Width 1712 mm vs 1845 mm 7% or 133 mm narrower
Height 1427 mm vs 1637 mm 13% or 210 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2540 mm vs 2702 mm 6% or 162 mm less
Front tires size 195/55 VR15 vs 205/60 R16
Rear tires size 195/55 VR15 vs 205/60 R16
Spare wheel 195/55 VR15 vs 205/60 R16
Type of wheels 15" alloy wheels vs 16" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)