Last Update: May. 25, 2019, 5:11 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo 146 and Kia Venga

What is Better Alfa Romeo 146 or Kia Venga?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo 146 Kia Venga

11 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo 146

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 82 mm vs 77 mm 6% or 5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 75.65 mm vs 75 mm 1% or 0.65000000000001 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

120 bhp vs 89 bhp

88 kw. vs 66 kw.

26% or 31 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 144 nM vs 137 nM 5% or 7 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 10.6 sec. vs 12.4 sec. 1.8 sec.
More top speed 121 mph vs 104 mph 17 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 34.01 mpg vs 45.56 mpg 34% or 11.55 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 44.11 mpg vs 51.42 mpg 17% or 7.31 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 25 mpg vs 37.7 mpg 51% or 12.7 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 51 liters vs 48 liters 6% or 3 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1200 kg vs 550 kg 54% or 650 kg

7 reasons to buy Kia Venga

Engine and transmission
Better compression 10.5 vs 10.3 2% or 0.2 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 91 g/mile vs 121 g/mile 33% or 30 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 2 3 generations
Weight and capacity
More maximum bearing capacity 532 kg vs 520 kg 2% or 12 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Years 7 years vs 3 years 57% or 4 years
Other specs
Less weight 1178 kg vs 1190 kg 1% or 12 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.42 meters vs 11.5 meters 10% or 1.08 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo 146 vs. Kia Venga

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6300 RPM vs 6000 RPM 5% or 300 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1598 cm3 vs 1396 cm3 13% or 202 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4257 mm vs 4068 mm 4% or 189 mm shorter
Width 1712 mm vs 1765 mm 3% or 53 mm narrower
Height 1426 mm vs 1600 mm 11% or 174 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2540 mm vs 2615 mm 3% or 75 mm less
Front tires size 185/60 HR14 vs 195/65 R15
Rear tires size 185/60 HR14 vs 195/65 R15
Spare wheel 115/70 R 15 vs Compact
Type of wheels 5.5J X 14" alloy wheels vs 15" steel
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)