Last Update: Mar. 23, 2019, 5:35 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo 146 and Suzuki Wagon-R+ (Solio)

What is Better Alfa Romeo 146 or Suzuki Wagon-R+ (Solio)?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo 146 Suzuki Wagon-R+ (Solio)

14 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo 146

Engine and transmission
Better compression 10.3 vs 9.5 8% or 0.8 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 82 mm vs 78 mm 5% or 4 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 75.65 mm vs 69.5 mm 8% or 6.15 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

120 bhp vs 92.5 bhp

88 kw. vs 68 kw.

23% or 27.5 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 144 nM vs 118 nM 18% or 26 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 10.6 sec. vs 12.8 sec. 2.2 sec.
More top speed 121 mph vs 99 mph 22 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 34.01 mpg vs 44.78 mpg 32% or 10.77 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 44.11 mpg vs 53.27 mpg 21% or 9.16 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 25 mpg vs 35.28 mpg 41% or 10.28 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 51 liters vs 41 liters 20% or 10 liters
More maximum allowable weight 1710 kg vs 1460 kg 15% or 250 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 520 kg vs 485 kg 7% or 35 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1200 kg vs 800 kg 33% or 400 kg

5 reasons to buy Suzuki Wagon-R+ (Solio)

Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 93 g/mile vs 121 g/mile 30% or 28 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 2 2 generations
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
Other specs
Less weight 975 kg vs 1190 kg 22% or 215 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 9.8 meters vs 11.5 meters 17% or 1.7 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo 146 vs. Suzuki Wagon-R+ (Solio)

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6300 RPM vs 6000 RPM 5% or 300 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1598 cm3 vs 1328 cm3 17% or 270 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4257 mm vs 3540 mm 17% or 717 mm shorter
Width 1712 mm vs 1620 mm 5% or 92 mm wider
Height 1426 mm vs 1665 mm 14% or 239 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2540 mm vs 2360 mm 7% or 180 mm more
Front tires size 185/60 HR14 vs 165/60 R14
Rear tires size 185/60 HR14 vs 165/60 R14
Type of wheels 5.5J X 14" alloy wheels vs 14" steel
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)