Last Update: May. 24, 2019, 5:56 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo 147 and Nissan Maxima QX

What is Better Alfa Romeo 147 or Nissan Maxima QX?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo 147 Nissan Maxima QX

13 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo 147

Engine and transmission
Better compression 10.5 vs 9.5 10% or 1 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 93 mm vs 76 mm 18% or 17 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 78 mm vs 73.3 mm 6% or 4.7 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

250 bhp vs 140 bhp

184 kw. vs 103 kw.

44% or 110 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 300 nM vs 179 nM 40% or 121 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 6.3 sec. vs 11.3 sec. 5 sec.
More top speed 153 mph vs 126 mph 27 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 23.3 mpg vs 30.69 mpg 32% or 7.39 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 32.78 mpg vs 38.69 mpg 18% or 5.91 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 15.6 mpg vs 23 mpg 47% or 7.4 mpg
Weight and capacity
More maximum trunk space 1030 liters vs 520 liters 50% or 510 liters
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 8 years vs 6 years 25% or 2 years
Other specs
Less weight 1360 kg vs 1415 kg 4% or 55 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

6 reasons to buy Nissan Maxima QX

Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 137 g/mile vs 178 g/mile 30% or 41 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 70 liters vs 63 liters 10% or 7 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2015 kg vs 1880 kg 7% or 135 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 600 kg vs 520 kg 13% or 80 kg
More maximum roof load 100 kg vs 50 kg 50% or 50 kg
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.8 meters vs 12.1 meters 12% or 1.3 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo 147 vs. Nissan Maxima QX

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6200 RPM vs 6400 RPM 3% or 200 less rpms.
Engine capacity 3179 cm3 vs 1995 cm3 37% or 1184 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location V6 vs V6
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Distributor fuel injection vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4213 mm vs 4920 mm 14% or 707 mm shorter
Width 1764 mm vs 1780 mm 1% or 16 mm narrower
Height 1442 mm vs 1435 mm 0% or 7 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2546 mm vs 2750 mm 7% or 204 mm less
Front tires size 225/45 R17W vs 215/55 R16
Rear tires size 225/45 R17W vs 215/55 R16
Spare wheel puncture repair kit vs 215/55 R16
Type of wheels 7.5Jx17" alloy wheels vs 16 alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)