Last Update: Mar. 25, 2019, 5:57 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo 159 and Fiat Scudo

What is Better Alfa Romeo 159 or Fiat Scudo?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo 159 Fiat Scudo

11 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo 159

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 5 vs 4 1 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Piston stroke longer 90.4 mm vs 88 mm 3% or 2.4 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

210 bhp vs 120 bhp

154 kw. vs 88 kw.

43% or 90 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 400 nM vs 300 nM 25% or 100 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 8.3 sec. vs 12.8 sec. 4.5 sec.
More top speed 141 mph vs 99 mph 42 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (City) 29.1 mpg vs 30.69 mpg 5% or 1.59 mpg
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 119 g/mile vs 122 g/mile 3% or 3 g/mile
Warranty
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
Less weight 1645 kg vs 1841 kg 12% or 196 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 11.1 meters vs 12.2 meters 10% or 1.1 meters

8 reasons to buy Fiat Scudo

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.5 vs 17.0 3% or 0.5 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 85 mm vs 82 mm 4% or 3 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 38.19 mpg vs 39.2 mpg 3% or 1.01 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 44.11 mpg vs 48.66 mpg 10% or 4.55 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 80 liters vs 70 liters 13% or 10 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2791 kg vs 2210 kg 21% or 581 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 950 kg vs 565 kg 41% or 385 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2000 kg vs 1500 kg 25% or 500 kg

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo 159 vs. Fiat Scudo

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 2387 cm3 vs 1997 cm3 16% or 390 cm3 more
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Turbocharged and intercooled vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4660 mm vs 5135 mm 9% or 475 mm shorter
Width 1828 mm vs 1895 mm 4% or 67 mm narrower
Height 1422 mm vs 1980 mm 28% or 558 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2700 mm vs 3122 mm 14% or 422 mm less
Front tires size 225/50 R17 vs 215/65 R15
Rear tires size 225/50 R17 vs 215/65 R15
Spare wheel Compact vs 215/65 R15
Type of wheels 17" alloy wheels vs 15" steel
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)