Last Update: Apr. 05, 2020, 5:08 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo 166 and Renault Laguna

What is Better Alfa Romeo 166 or Renault Laguna?

Comparing Alfa Romeo 166 with Renault Laguna may help drivers make decision which model is more efficient. We came up with 11 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo 166 - it's winning Renault Laguna, according to the cases. Renault Laguna still shows 9 factors to buy it instead of Alfa Romeo 166. We gathered information about the models to provide a fair comparison of Renault Laguna with Alfa Romeo 166. You will compare two cars and find your personal emotions about them. The freshest technologies of Alfa Romeo are included in 166. Though take into account that Laguna includes the individual technologies of Renault.

Exterior

Alfa Romeo 166 Renault Laguna

11 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo 166

Engine and transmission
Better compression 10.0 vs 9.0 10% or 1 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 83 mm vs 82.7 mm 0% or 0.3 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.1 mpg vs 35.28 mpg 21% or 6.18 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 38.69 mpg vs 43.38 mpg 12% or 4.69 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 20.5 mpg vs 26.11 mpg 27% or 5.61 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 490 liters vs 423 liters 14% or 67 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 69 liters vs 66 liters 4% or 3 liters
More maximum allowable weight 1930 kg vs 1923 kg 0% or 7 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 510 kg vs 495 kg 3% or 15 kg
Other specs
Less weight 1420 kg vs 1428 kg 1% or 8 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
More seats 5 vs 4 1

9 reasons to buy Renault Laguna

Engine and transmission
Piston stroke longer 93 mm vs 91 mm 2% or 2 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

205 bhp vs 150 bhp

150 kw. vs 110 kw.

27% or 55 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 300 nM vs 181 nM 40% or 119 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.8 sec. vs 9.8 sec. 2 sec.
More top speed 144 mph vs 131 mph 13 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 115 g/mile vs 143 g/mile 24% or 28 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 3 2 generations
Weight and capacity
More maximum towing weight without brakes 650 kg vs 500 kg 23% or 150 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 99441 miles vs 62150 miles 38% or 37291 miles

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo 166 vs. Renault Laguna

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 6300 RPM vs 5000 RPM 21% or 1300 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1970 cm3 vs 1998 cm3 1% or 28 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Distributor fuel injection vs Fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4720 mm vs 4643 mm 2% or 77 mm shorter
Width 1800 mm vs 1812 mm 1% or 12 mm narrower
Height 1416 mm vs 1398 mm 1% or 18 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2700 mm vs 2694 mm 0% or 6 mm more
Front tires size 215/55 WR16 vs 225/45 R18
Rear tires size 215/55 WR16 vs 225/45 R18
Spare wheel Compact vs kit for wheel pumping
Type of wheels 16 alloy wheels vs 18" alloy wheels
Style of wheels 8 bolt holes vs CELSIUM
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)