Last Update: Apr. 07, 2020, 5:34 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Brera and Suzuki Kizashi

What is Better Alfa Romeo Brera or Suzuki Kizashi?

Compare Alfa Romeo Brera vs. Suzuki Kizashi by all-important characteristics. When looking at the models, buyers will see 7 things that send Alfa Romeo Brera to first place compared to Suzuki Kizashi. But Suzuki Kizashi also has some pluses: get to know 5 points why it's better than Alfa Romeo Brera. We can name key features of Alfa Romeo Brera and Suzuki Kizashi which were taken into account when comparing. Take acceleration or efficiency, look at size, and conveniently compare two cars. Alfa Romeo did a lot to introduce Brera as the best car in its class. Nevertheless Suzuki doesn't give up and presents its new technologies in Kizashi. If you had the opportunity, which car would you choose?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo Brera Suzuki Kizashi

7 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Brera

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 6 vs 4 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

260 bhp vs 175 bhp

191 kw. vs

33% or 85 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7 sec. vs 8.5 sec. 1.5 sec.
More top speed 152 mph vs 127 mph 25 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 23.21 mpg vs 33.71 mpg 45% or 10.5 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 70 liters vs 63 liters 10% or 7 liters
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.7 meters vs 11 meters 3% or 0.3 meters

5 reasons to buy Suzuki Kizashi

Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 119 g/mile vs 178 g/mile 50% or 59 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 461 liters vs 300 liters 35% or 161 liters
More maximum towing weight without brakes 720 kg vs 500 kg 31% or 220 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1700 kg vs 1500 kg 12% or 200 kg

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Brera vs. Suzuki Kizashi

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 3195 cm3 vs 2393 cm3 25% or 802 cm3 more
Fuel supply Direct fuel injection vs Multi-point injection fuel
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4410 mm vs 4650 mm 5% or 240 mm shorter
Width 1830 mm vs 1820 mm 1% or 10 mm wider
Height 1341 mm vs 1470 mm 9% or 129 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2528 mm vs 2700 mm 6% or 172 mm less
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)