Last Update: Apr. 05, 2020, 5:08 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Giulietta and Audi A2

What is Better Alfa Romeo Giulietta or Audi A2?

Comparing Alfa Romeo Giulietta with Audi A2 will help drivers make it clear which car is worth buying. The comparison came up with 13 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Giulietta - it's better than Audi A2, according to these cases. Audi A2 still offers 7 ideas to choose it instead of Alfa Romeo Giulietta. By looking at the most prominent features, our team revealed evident distinctions of Alfa Romeo Giulietta and Audi A2. Giulietta was produced by Alfa Romeo to outperform contestants in the class.

Exterior

Alfa Romeo Giulietta Audi A2

13 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Giulietta

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 4 vs 3 1 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More valves per cylinder 4 vs 2 2 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
More engine power

120 bhp vs 75 bhp

88 kw. vs 55 kw.

38% or 45 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 206 nM vs 195 nM 5% or 11 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.4 sec. vs 12.3 sec. 2.9 sec.
More top speed 121 mph vs 107 mph 14 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 44.11 mpg vs 64.13 mpg 45% or 20.02 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 53.27 mpg vs 78.41 mpg 47% or 25.14 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 33.62 mpg vs 49.58 mpg 47% or 15.96 mpg
Emissions
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 60 liters vs 34 liters 43% or 26 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1300 kg vs 1000 kg 23% or 300 kg
Other specs
More seats 5 vs 4 1

7 reasons to buy Audi A2

Engine and transmission
Better compression 19.5 vs 9.8 50% or 9.7 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 79.5 mm vs 72 mm 9% or 7.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 95.5 mm vs 84 mm 12% or 11.5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 74 g/mile vs 93 g/mile 26% or 19 g/mile
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
Other specs
Less weight 990 kg vs 1280 kg 29% or 290 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.5 meters vs 10.9 meters 4% or 0.4 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Giulietta vs. Audi A2

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5000 RPM vs 4000 RPM 20% or 1000 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 1422 cm3 4% or 54 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs SOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4351 mm vs 3826 mm 12% or 525 mm shorter
Width 1798 mm vs 1673 mm 7% or 125 mm wider
Height 1465 mm vs 1553 mm 6% or 88 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2634 mm vs 2405 mm 9% or 229 mm more
Front tires size 205/55 R16 vs 175/60 R 15
Rear tires size 205/55 R16 vs 175/60 R 15
Spare wheel Compact vs 175/60 R 15
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs 5.5J X 15 alloy wheels
Style of wheels 5 double spokes vs alloy wheels forged aluminum
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)