Last Update: Apr. 09, 2020, 5:42 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Giulietta and Honda CR-Z

What is Better Alfa Romeo Giulietta or Honda CR-Z?

Making a choice of Honda CR-Z and Alfa Romeo Giulietta might become difficult, so we want to compare them. Our research found 9 reasons to purchase Alfa Romeo Giulietta - it's winning Honda CR-Z, according to these points. For a lot of motorists, Honda CR-Z can still appear a better purchase than Alfa Romeo Giulietta because there are 8 reasons of this. The comparison of Alfa Romeo Giulietta and Honda CR-Z takes into account every needed factor and shows information. You can compare two cars and form your personal emotions about models. The most effective technologies of Alfa Romeo are hidden in Giulietta. Drivers agree that Honda actually did everything to turn CR-Z into a great success. The thorough review can't form any doubts about buying a vehicle.


Alfa Romeo Giulietta Honda CR-Z

9 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Giulietta

Engine and transmission
More engine power

120 bhp vs 114 bhp

88 kw. vs 84 kw.

5% or 6 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 206 nM vs 145 nM 30% or 61 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.4 sec. vs 9.9 sec. 0.5 sec.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 44.11 mpg vs 56.46 mpg 28% or 12.35 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 53.27 mpg vs 64.13 mpg 20% or 10.86 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 33.62 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 38% or 12.65 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 60 liters vs 40 liters 33% or 20 liters
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 93226 miles 91% or 901180 miles
Other specs
More seats 5 vs 4 1

8 reasons to buy Honda CR-Z

Engine and transmission
Better compression 10.4 vs 9.8 6% or 0.6 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 73 mm vs 72 mm 1% or 1 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 89.4 mm vs 84 mm 6% or 5.4 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More top speed 124 mph vs 121 mph 3 mph
Less CO2 emissions 73 g/mile vs 93 g/mile 27% or 20 g/mile
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
Other specs
Less weight 1198 kg vs 1280 kg 7% or 82 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10 meters vs 10.9 meters 9% or 0.9 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Giulietta vs. Honda CR-Z

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5000 RPM vs 6100 RPM 18% or 1100 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 1497 cm3 9% or 129 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs SOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Length 4351 mm vs 4080 mm 6% or 271 mm shorter
Width 1798 mm vs 1740 mm 3% or 58 mm wider
Height 1465 mm vs 1395 mm 5% or 70 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2634 mm vs 2425 mm 8% or 209 mm more
Front tires size 205/55 R16 vs 195/55 R16
Rear tires size 205/55 R16 vs 195/55 R16
Spare wheel Compact vs Instant tire repair
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs 16" alloy wheels
Style of wheels 5 double spokes vs 5 spokes
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)