Last Update: Mar. 28, 2020, 5:57 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Giulietta and Kia Carens

What is Better Alfa Romeo Giulietta or Kia Carens?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo Giulietta Kia Carens

8 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Giulietta

Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.4 sec. vs 12.6 sec. 3.2 sec.
More top speed 121 mph vs 116 mph 5 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 93 g/mile vs 117 g/mile 26% or 24 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 60 liters vs 55 liters 8% or 5 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1300 kg vs 1100 kg 15% or 200 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 8 years vs 6 years 25% or 2 years
Other specs
Less weight 1280 kg vs 1652 kg 29% or 372 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

10 reasons to buy Kia Carens

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.3 vs 9.8 43% or 7.5 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 83 mm vs 72 mm 13% or 11 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 92 mm vs 84 mm 9% or 8 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

138 bhp vs 120 bhp

103 kw. vs 88 kw.

13% or 18 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 305 nM vs 206 nM 32% or 99 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 39.8 mpg vs 44.11 mpg 11% or 4.31 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 49.58 mpg vs 53.27 mpg 7% or 3.69 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 29.39 mpg vs 33.62 mpg 14% or 4.23 mpg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Years 7 years vs 3 years 57% or 4 years
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.8 meters vs 10.9 meters 1% or 0.1 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Giulietta vs. Kia Carens

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5000 RPM vs 4000 RPM 20% or 1000 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 1991 cm3 31% or 623 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs SOHC
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 4 2 more
Dimensions
Length 4351 mm vs 4545 mm 4% or 194 mm shorter
Width 1798 mm vs 1820 mm 1% or 22 mm narrower
Height 1465 mm vs 1700 mm 14% or 235 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2634 mm vs 2700 mm 2% or 66 mm less
Front tires size 205/55 R16 vs 205/60 R16
Rear tires size 205/55 R16 vs 205/60 R16
Spare wheel Compact vs Compact
Type of wheels 16" alloy wheels vs 16" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)