Last Update: Apr. 05, 2020, 5:08 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Giulietta and Kia Proceed

What is Better Alfa Romeo Giulietta or Kia Proceed?

Comparing Alfa Romeo Giulietta with Kia Proceed might help you make it clear which model is better. There are 3 huge reasons why Alfa Romeo Giulietta is surely a more sensible buy than Kia Proceed. Anyway, Kia Proceed shows 5 weighty pluses that show it as a good buy instead of Alfa Romeo Giulietta. We gathered data about the vehicles to present a fair match of Kia Proceed and Alfa Romeo Giulietta. So we suggest that you compare two cars and make up your mind which one you'd like to purchase. Alfa Romeo did great work to introduce Giulietta as the most worthwhile vehicle in its competitive section. But Kia doesn't give up and presents its new technologies in Proceed.


Alfa Romeo Giulietta Kia Proceed

3 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Giulietta

Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.4 sec. vs 9.8 sec. 0.4 sec.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 44.11 mpg vs 47.2 mpg 7% or 3.09 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 60 liters vs 53 liters 12% or 7 liters

5 reasons to buy Kia Proceed

Engine and transmission
More engine power

133 bhp vs 120 bhp

vs 88 kw.

10% or 13 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Less CO2 emissions 77 g/mile vs 93 g/mile 21% or 16 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1400 kg vs 1300 kg 7% or 100 kg
Other specs
Less weight 1267 kg vs 1280 kg 1% or 13 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10 meters vs 10.9 meters 9% or 0.9 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Giulietta vs. Kia Proceed

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 1591 cm3 14% or 223 cm3 less
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs Multi-point injection fuel
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Length 4351 mm vs 4310 mm 1% or 41 mm shorter
Width 1798 mm vs 1780 mm 1% or 18 mm wider
Height 1465 mm vs 1425 mm 3% or 40 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2634 mm vs 2650 mm 1% or 16 mm less
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)