Last Update: Apr. 03, 2020, 5:10 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo GT and Ford Maverick

What is Better Alfa Romeo GT or Ford Maverick?

Comparing Alfa Romeo GT with Ford Maverick will help you make it clear which model is more efficient. You can see 12 huge reasons why Alfa Romeo GT is undoubtedly a more reasonable buy than Ford Maverick. Also, Ford Maverick provides 8 weighty advantages that turn it into good buy instead of Alfa Romeo GT. We can name major options of Alfa Romeo GT and Ford Maverick that were taken into account when matching. So we propose you compare two cars and decide which vehicle you'd want to purchase. The freshest technologies of Alfa Romeo are presented in GT. The detailed comparison won't leave any doubts about choosing a vehicle.

Exterior

Alfa Romeo GT Ford Maverick

12 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo GT

Engine and transmission
More torque 305 nM vs 265 nM 13% or 40 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.6 sec. vs 10.2 sec. 0.6 sec.
More top speed 130 mph vs 112 mph 18 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 103 g/mile vs 182 g/mile 77% or 79 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 3 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More maximum trunk space 905 liters vs 490 liters 46% or 415 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 63 liters vs 61 liters 3% or 2 liters
More maximum allowable weight 1885 kg vs 1858 kg 1% or 27 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 520 kg vs 405 kg 22% or 115 kg
More maximum roof load 50 kg vs 45.4 kg 9% or 4.6 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1365 kg vs 1560 kg 14% or 195 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

8 reasons to buy Ford Maverick

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 6 vs 4 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

197 bhp vs 150 bhp

145 kw. vs 110 kw.

24% or 47 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 23 mpg vs 45.56 mpg 98% or 22.56 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 30.41 mpg vs 57.56 mpg 89% or 27.15 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 16.1 mpg vs 33.19 mpg 106% or 17.09 mpg
Weight and capacity
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1700 kg vs 1300 kg 24% or 400 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
Other specs
Less turning radius 11.2 meters vs 11.5 meters 3% or 0.3 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo GT vs. Ford Maverick

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 6000 RPM 33% or 2000 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1910 cm3 vs 2967 cm3 36% or 1057 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs V6
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply Direct fuel injection with turbocharging vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 4 2 more
Dimensions
Length 4489 mm vs 4395 mm 2% or 94 mm shorter
Width 1763 mm vs 1825 mm 3% or 62 mm narrower
Height 1366 mm vs 1774 mm 23% or 408 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2596 mm vs 2620 mm 1% or 24 mm less
Front tires size 255/40 R18 vs 235/70 R16
Rear tires size 255/40 R18 vs 235/70 R16
Spare wheel Compact vs 235/70 R16
Type of wheels 18" alloy wheels vs 16 alloy wheels
Style of wheels 5 spokes vs 5 spokes aluminum
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)