Last Update: Mar. 31, 2020, 5:34 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Mito and Citroen C1

What is Better Alfa Romeo Mito or Citroen C1?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo Mito Citroen C1

13 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Mito

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 4 vs 2 2 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
Piston stroke longer 84 mm vs 82 mm 2% or 2 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

120 bhp vs 55 bhp

88 kw. vs 41 kw.

54% or 65 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 206 nM vs 130 nM 37% or 76 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 8.8 sec. vs 15.6 sec. 6.8 sec.
More top speed 123 mph vs 96 mph 27 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 46.27 mpg vs 67.24 mpg 45% or 20.97 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 56.46 mpg vs 83.1 mpg 47% or 26.64 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 34.91 mpg vs 53.27 mpg 53% or 18.36 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 270 liters vs 139 liters 49% or 131 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 45 liters vs 35 liters 22% or 10 liters
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
More seats 5 vs 4 1

6 reasons to buy Citroen C1

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.9 vs 9.8 45% or 8.1 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 74 mm vs 72 mm 3% or 2 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 68 g/mile vs 90 g/mile 32% or 22 g/mile
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
Other specs
Less weight 890 kg vs 1145 kg 29% or 255 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 9.5 meters vs 11.3 meters 19% or 1.8 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Mito vs. Citroen C1

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5000 RPM vs 4000 RPM 20% or 1000 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 1398 cm3 2% or 30 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs Direct fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4063 mm vs 3435 mm 15% or 628 mm shorter
Width 1720 mm vs 1630 mm 5% or 90 mm wider
Height 1446 mm vs 1465 mm 1% or 19 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2511 mm vs 2340 mm 7% or 171 mm more
Front tires size 195/55 R16 vs 155/65 R14
Rear tires size 195/55 R16 vs 155/65 R14
Type of wheels 16" steel vs 14" steel
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)