Last Update: Apr. 06, 2020, 5:51 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Mito and Honda S2000

What is Better Alfa Romeo Mito or Honda S2000?

Comparing Alfa Romeo Mito with Honda S2000 might help you make it clear which vehicle is worth buying. There are 6 weighty arguments why Alfa Romeo Mito is actually a more advantageous purchase than Honda S2000. Although Honda S2000 also has many advantages: think about 11 points why it's beating Alfa Romeo Mito. There are key options of Alfa Romeo Mito and Honda S2000 that were used when making comparison. The best technical units of Alfa Romeo are included in Mito. If you had the opportunity, which model would you buy?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo Mito Honda S2000

6 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Mito

Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 90 g/mile vs 147 g/mile 63% or 57 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 270 liters vs 142 liters 47% or 128 liters
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 8 years vs 6 years 25% or 2 years
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 93226 miles 91% or 901180 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1145 kg vs 1271 kg 11% or 126 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
More seats 5 vs 2 3

11 reasons to buy Honda S2000

Engine and transmission
Better compression 11.0 vs 9.8 11% or 1.2 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 87 mm vs 72 mm 17% or 15 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

240 bhp vs 120 bhp

177 kw. vs 88 kw.

50% or 120 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 208 nM vs 206 nM 1% or 2 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 6.2 sec. vs 8.8 sec. 2.6 sec.
More top speed 150 mph vs 123 mph 27 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 28.2 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 64% or 18.07 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 36.2 mpg vs 56.46 mpg 56% or 20.26 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 20.29 mpg vs 34.91 mpg 72% or 14.62 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 50 liters vs 45 liters 10% or 5 liters
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.8 meters vs 11.3 meters 5% or 0.5 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Mito vs. Honda S2000

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5000 RPM vs 8300 RPM 40% or 3300 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 1997 cm3 31% or 629 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 6 1 less
Dimensions
Length 4063 mm vs 4135 mm 2% or 72 mm shorter
Width 1720 mm vs 1750 mm 2% or 30 mm narrower
Height 1446 mm vs 1270 mm 12% or 176 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2511 mm vs 2400 mm 4% or 111 mm more
Front tires size 195/55 R16 vs 215/45 R17
Rear tires size 195/55 R16 vs 245/40 R17
Type of wheels 16" steel vs 17" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)