Last Update: Apr. 09, 2020, 5:42 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Mito and Mazda RX-8

What is Better Alfa Romeo Mito or Mazda RX-8?

Comparing Alfa Romeo Mito with Mazda RX-8 will help buyers make it clear which vehicle is more efficient. There are 4 huge arguments why Alfa Romeo Mito is undoubtedly a more advantageous purchase than Mazda RX-8. Anyway, Mazda RX-8 provides 12 weighty benefits that turn it into good purchase instead of Alfa Romeo Mito. The comparison of Alfa Romeo Mito and Mazda RX-8 takes into account every single feature and sums up data. So our experts offer everyone compare two cars and make up your mind which model you'd want to buy. Mito provides all the appreciated benefits of Alfa Romeo. Although don't forget that RX-8 has got the individual technologies of Mazda. Which of the contestants in our review would you possess?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo Mito Mazda RX-8

4 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Mito

Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 90 g/mile vs 166 g/mile 84% or 76 g/mile
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1145 kg vs 1390 kg 21% or 245 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
More seats 5 vs 4 1

12 reasons to buy Mazda RX-8

Engine and transmission
Better compression 10 vs 9.8 2% or 0.2 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
More engine power

192 bhp vs 120 bhp

141 kw. vs 88 kw.

38% or 72 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 220 nM vs 206 nM 6% or 14 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.2 sec. vs 8.8 sec. 1.6 sec.
More top speed 139 mph vs 123 mph 16 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 26.19 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 77% or 20.08 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 34.01 mpg vs 56.46 mpg 66% or 22.45 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 18.7 mpg vs 34.91 mpg 87% or 16.21 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 290 liters vs 270 liters 7% or 20 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 61 liters vs 45 liters 26% or 16 liters
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.6 meters vs 11.3 meters 7% or 0.7 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Mito vs. Mazda RX-8

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5000 RPM vs 7000 RPM 29% or 2000 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 1308 cm3 4% or 60 cm3 more
Cylinders location In line vs Rotating cylinder block
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs Direct fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4063 mm vs 4430 mm 8% or 367 mm shorter
Width 1720 mm vs 1780 mm 3% or 60 mm narrower
Height 1446 mm vs 1340 mm 7% or 106 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2511 mm vs 2700 mm 7% or 189 mm less
Front tires size 195/55 R16 vs 225/45R18
Rear tires size 195/55 R16 vs 225/45R18
Type of wheels 16" steel vs 18" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)