Last Update: Apr. 06, 2020, 5:51 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Mito and MINI John Cooper Works

What is Better Alfa Romeo Mito or MINI John Cooper Works?

Comparing Alfa Romeo Mito with MINI John Cooper Works will help buyers make it clear which model is better. There are 4 huge arguments why Alfa Romeo Mito is undoubtedly a more effective choice than MINI John Cooper Works. MINI John Cooper Works still offers 13 factors to choose it rather than Alfa Romeo Mito. Our team summarized information about the models to provide a full match of MINI John Cooper Works and Alfa Romeo Mito. Compare speed or efficiency, measure length, and easily compare two cars. Though MINI doesn't fall behind and includes its new developments in John Cooper Works. Which of the models in our review would you choose?


Alfa Romeo Mito MINI John Cooper Works

4 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Mito

Less CO2 emissions 90 g/mile vs 104 g/mile 16% or 14 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 270 liters vs 260 liters 4% or 10 liters
More warranty against corrosion 8 years vs 6 years 25% or 2 years
Other specs
Less weight 1145 kg vs 1205 kg 5% or 60 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

13 reasons to buy MINI John Cooper Works

Engine and transmission
Better compression 10.0 vs 9.8 2% or 0.2 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 77 mm vs 72 mm 6% or 5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 85.8 mm vs 84 mm 2% or 1.8 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

211 bhp vs 120 bhp

155 kw. vs 88 kw.

43% or 91 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 260 nM vs 206 nM 21% or 54 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 6.8 sec. vs 8.8 sec. 2 sec.
More top speed 148 mph vs 123 mph 25 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 39.2 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 18% or 7.07 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 48.66 mpg vs 56.46 mpg 16% or 7.8 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 29.69 mpg vs 34.91 mpg 18% or 5.22 mpg
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 50 liters vs 45 liters 10% or 5 liters
Other specs
Less turning radius 11 meters vs 11.3 meters 3% or 0.3 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Mito vs. MINI John Cooper Works

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5000 RPM vs 6000 RPM 17% or 1000 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 1598 cm3 14% or 230 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs Fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 6 1 less
Length 4063 mm vs 3961 mm 3% or 102 mm shorter
Width 1720 mm vs 1683 mm 2% or 37 mm wider
Height 1446 mm vs 1426 mm 1% or 20 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2511 mm vs 2547 mm 1% or 36 mm less
Front tires size 195/55 R16 vs 205/45 R17
Rear tires size 195/55 R16 vs 205/45 R17
Type of wheels 16" steel vs 17" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)