Last Update: Mar. 28, 2020, 5:57 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Mito and Volkswagen Bora

What is Better Alfa Romeo Mito or Volkswagen Bora?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo Mito Volkswagen Bora

10 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Mito

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 4 vs 2 2 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
More engine power

120 bhp vs 100 bhp

88 kw. vs 74 kw.

17% or 20 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 8.8 sec. vs 12.1 sec. 3.3 sec.
More top speed 123 mph vs 117 mph 6 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 46.27 mpg vs 53.27 mpg 15% or 7 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 56.46 mpg vs 64.13 mpg 14% or 7.67 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 34.91 mpg vs 41.48 mpg 19% or 6.57 mpg
Emissions
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 3 1 generation
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1145 kg vs 1427 kg 25% or 282 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

8 reasons to buy Volkswagen Bora

Engine and transmission
Better compression 19.0 vs 9.8 48% or 9.2 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 79.5 mm vs 72 mm 9% or 7.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 95.5 mm vs 84 mm 12% or 11.5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More torque 240 nM vs 206 nM 14% or 34 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 89 g/mile vs 90 g/mile 1% or 1 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 55 liters vs 45 liters 18% or 10 liters
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 8 years 33% or 4 years
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.9 meters vs 11.3 meters 4% or 0.4 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Mito vs. Volkswagen Bora

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 5000 RPM vs 4000 RPM 20% or 1000 more rpms.
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 1896 cm3 28% or 528 cm3 less
Engine position Front transverse vs Front transverse
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4063 mm vs 4376 mm 7% or 313 mm shorter
Width 1720 mm vs 1735 mm 1% or 15 mm narrower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2511 mm vs 2513 mm 0% or 2 mm less
Front tires size 195/55 R16 vs 195/65 R15V
Rear tires size 195/55 R16 vs 195/65 R15V
Type of wheels 16" steel vs 6Jx15" steel
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)