Last Update: Apr. 05, 2020, 5:08 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Mito and Volkswagen Golf

What is Better Alfa Romeo Mito or Volkswagen Golf?

Comparing Alfa Romeo Mito with Volkswagen Golf will help people make it clear which vehicle is better. There are 3 huge reasons why Alfa Romeo Mito is actually a more reasonable choice than Volkswagen Golf. Volkswagen Golf also offers 5 reasons to choose it instead of Alfa Romeo Mito. The review of Alfa Romeo Mito and Volkswagen Golf considers every single point and shows information. It will help you decide on the better choice - compare two cars before buying. Mito was developed by Alfa Romeo to outperform contestants on the market. But Volkswagen doesn't give up and presents its edge technologies in Golf. Which of the cars in our match would you choose?

Exterior

Alfa Romeo Mito Volkswagen Golf

3 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Mito

Engine and transmission
More engine power

120 bhp vs 83 bhp

88 kw. vs

31% or 37 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
More top speed 123 mph vs 111 mph 12 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 46.27 mpg vs 59 mpg 28% or 12.73 mpg

5 reasons to buy Volkswagen Golf

Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 70 g/mile vs 90 g/mile 29% or 20 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 50 liters vs 45 liters 10% or 5 liters
Other specs
Less weight 1130 kg vs 1145 kg 1% or 15 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10 meters vs 11.3 meters 13% or 1.3 meters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Mito vs. Volkswagen Golf

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 1197 cm3 13% or 171 cm3 more
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4063 mm vs 4268 mm 5% or 205 mm shorter
Width 1720 mm vs 2027 mm 15% or 307 mm narrower
Height 1446 mm vs 1442 mm 0% or 4 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2511 mm vs 2631 mm 5% or 120 mm less
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)