Last Update: Apr. 06, 2020, 5:51 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Alfa Romeo Mito and Volvo V40

What is Better Alfa Romeo Mito or Volvo V40?

Choosing for Volvo V40 or Alfa Romeo Mito could appear complicated, so we want to compare the models. We found 2 huge arguments why Alfa Romeo Mito is undoubtedly a more effective purchase than Volvo V40. For many buyers, Volvo V40 will still become a more suitable choice than Alfa Romeo Mito as it shows 7 factors of this. We found vital characteristics of Alfa Romeo Mito and Volvo V40 that were used while matching. So we offer you compare two cars and decide which vehicle you'd want to purchase. Mito was developed by Alfa Romeo to win competitors in the class. Though V40 is impossible to see as a worse model, as Volvo gave out a great deal of efforts in the development. The thorough match can't keep any questions about choosing a car.

Exterior

Alfa Romeo Mito Volvo V40

2 reasons to buy Alfa Romeo Mito

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 46.27 mpg vs 47.2 mpg 2% or 0.93 mpg
Other specs
Less weight 1145 kg vs 1409 kg 23% or 264 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

7 reasons to buy Volvo V40

Engine and transmission
More engine power

177 bhp vs 120 bhp

vs 88 kw.

32% or 57 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.5 sec. vs 8.8 sec. 1.3 sec.
More top speed 134 mph vs 123 mph 11 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 80 g/mile vs 90 g/mile 13% or 10 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 402 liters vs 270 liters 33% or 132 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 62 liters vs 45 liters 27% or 17 liters

Neutral reasons Alfa Romeo Mito vs. Volvo V40

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1368 cm3 vs 1596 cm3 14% or 228 cm3 less
Fuel supply Fuel injection with turbocharging vs Turbocharged
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 6 1 less
Dimensions
Length 4063 mm vs 4370 mm 7% or 307 mm shorter
Width 1720 mm vs 2041 mm 16% or 321 mm narrower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2511 mm vs 2646 mm 5% or 135 mm less
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)