Last Update: Apr. 07, 2020, 5:34 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW 3-Series and Volvo C70

What is Better BMW 3-Series or Volvo C70?

Choosing between Volvo C70 or BMW 3-Series can seem difficult, so we'll compare the models. We found 6 weighty reasons why BMW 3-Series is actually a more advantageous buy than Volvo C70. Volvo C70 anyway shows 6 reasons to purchase it rather than BMW 3-Series. The match of BMW 3-Series and Volvo C70 takes into account every vital feature and shows information. You may compare two cars and form your own opinion about models. BMW did a lot to present 3-Series as the best model in its market segment. Though Volvo doesn't fall behind and includes its new developments in C70. The overall review can't leave any doubts about choosing a car.


BMW 3-Series Volvo C70

6 reasons to buy BMW 3-Series

Less CO2 emissions 95 g/mile vs 135 g/mile 42% or 40 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 6 vs EURO 4 2 generations
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 520 liters vs 404 liters 22% or 116 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1600 kg vs 1500 kg 6% or 100 kg
Other specs
Less weight 1540 kg vs 1645 kg 7% or 105 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 11 meters vs 11.8 meters 7% or 0.8 meters

6 reasons to buy Volvo C70

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 5 vs 4 1 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

220 bhp vs 181 bhp

162 kw. vs

18% or 39 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More top speed 150 mph vs 143 mph 7 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 31.01 mpg vs 39.33 mpg 27% or 8.32 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 62 liters vs 60 liters 3% or 2 liters
More maximum towing weight without brakes 700 kg vs 695 kg 1% or 5 kg

Neutral reasons BMW 3-Series vs. Volvo C70

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1997 cm3 vs 2521 cm3 21% or 524 cm3 less
Fuel supply Turbocharged vs Fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Length 4824 mm vs 4582 mm 5% or 242 mm shorter
Width 2047 mm vs 1820 mm 11% or 227 mm wider
Height 1508 mm vs 1400 mm 7% or 108 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2920 mm vs 2640 mm 10% or 280 mm more
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)