Last Update: Apr. 06, 2020, 5:51 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW 5-Series and Nissan Maxima QX

What is Better BMW 5-Series or Nissan Maxima QX?

Do you try to figure out which vehicle wins: BMW 5-Series or Nissan Maxima QX? Our research came up with 9 ideas to choose BMW 5-Series - it's above Nissan Maxima QX, according to such arguments. Nevertheless, Nissan Maxima QX offers 3 weighty pluses that make it good buy instead of BMW 5-Series. By comparing the most important characteristics, our team revealed key distinctions of BMW 5-Series and Nissan Maxima QX. Choose steering or power, look at length, and easily compare two cars. BMW did great work to introduce 5-Series as the most worthwhile car in its class. Anyway Maxima QX is hard to call a less worthy vehicle, as Nissan invested much efforts in the development. The detailed match can't form any doubts about choosing a car.


BMW 5-Series Nissan Maxima QX

9 reasons to buy BMW 5-Series

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 6 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

552 bhp vs 140 bhp

vs 103 kw.

75% or 412 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 4.2 sec. vs 11.3 sec. 7.1 sec.
More top speed 155 mph vs 126 mph 29 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.5 mpg vs 30.69 mpg 4% or 1.19 mpg
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 3 2 generations
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 80 liters vs 70 liters 13% or 10 liters
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 700 kg 7% or 50 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2000 kg vs 1500 kg 25% or 500 kg

3 reasons to buy Nissan Maxima QX

Less CO2 emissions 137 g/mile vs 144 g/mile 5% or 7 g/mile
Other specs
Less weight 1415 kg vs 1870 kg 32% or 455 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.8 meters vs 12 meters 11% or 1.2 meters

Neutral reasons BMW 5-Series vs. Nissan Maxima QX

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 4395 cm3 vs 1995 cm3 55% or 2400 cm3 more
Fuel supply With a twin-turbocharged vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 7 vs 5 2 more
Length 4910 mm vs 4920 mm 0% or 10 mm shorter
Width 1891 mm vs 1780 mm 6% or 111 mm wider
Height 1456 mm vs 1435 mm 1% or 21 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2964 mm vs 2750 mm 7% or 214 mm more
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)