Last Update: Apr. 05, 2020, 5:08 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW 5-Series and Nissan X-Trail

What is Better BMW 5-Series or Nissan X-Trail?

Comparing BMW 5-Series with Nissan X-Trail can help people make decision which vehicle is better. The comparison found 7 reasons to choose BMW 5-Series - it's beating Nissan X-Trail, according to the points. Though Nissan X-Trail also has a lot of benefits: get to know 5 ideas why it's winning BMW 5-Series. By comparing the most prominent characteristics, our team came up with evident differences between BMW 5-Series and Nissan X-Trail. Compare steering or horse powers, look at dimensions, and comfortably compare two cars. BMW did a lot to present 5-Series as the most worthwhile vehicle in its competitive section. Though Nissan doesn't fall behind and presents its edge developments in X-Trail. If you had the chance, which vehicle would you buy?


BMW 5-Series Nissan X-Trail

7 reasons to buy BMW 5-Series

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 4 4 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

552 bhp vs 173 bhp

vs 127 kw.

69% or 379 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 4.2 sec. vs 10 sec. 5.8 sec.
More top speed 155 mph vs 124 mph 31 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.5 mpg vs 38.19 mpg 29% or 8.69 mpg
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 80 liters vs 65 liters 19% or 15 liters

5 reasons to buy Nissan X-Trail

Less CO2 emissions 123 g/mile vs 144 g/mile 17% or 21 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 603 liters vs 520 liters 14% or 83 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2200 kg vs 2000 kg 9% or 200 kg
Other specs
Less weight 1651 kg vs 1870 kg 13% or 219 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.8 meters vs 12 meters 11% or 1.2 meters

Neutral reasons BMW 5-Series vs. Nissan X-Trail

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 4395 cm3 vs 1995 cm3 55% or 2400 cm3 more
Fuel supply With a twin-turbocharged vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 7 vs 6 1 more
Length 4910 mm vs 4630 mm 6% or 280 mm shorter
Width 1891 mm vs 1785 mm 6% or 106 mm wider
Height 1456 mm vs 1685 mm 14% or 229 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2964 mm vs 2630 mm 11% or 334 mm more
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)