Last Update: Apr. 06, 2020, 5:51 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW 7-Series and Volkswagen Jetta

What is Better BMW 7-Series or Volkswagen Jetta?

Compare BMW 7-Series vs. Volkswagen Jetta by key specs. We found 8 weighty arguments why BMW 7-Series is actually a more effective choice than Volkswagen Jetta. Though Volkswagen Jetta also possesses a lot of advantages: look at 4 reasons why it's better than BMW 7-Series. Our team gathered information about the vehicles to present a fair comparison of Volkswagen Jetta with BMW 7-Series. Choose acceleration or horse powers, match length, and easily compare two cars. 7-Series offers all the classical pluses of BMW. Though Jetta is impossible to see as a worse car, as Volkswagen invested much efforts in the development. After summarizing all the information, you'll easily decide which vehicle to buy.


BMW 7-Series Volkswagen Jetta

8 reasons to buy BMW 7-Series

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 6 vs 4 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

326 bhp vs 103 bhp

240 kw. vs

68% or 223 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 5.9 sec. vs 11.3 sec. 5.4 sec.
More top speed 155 mph vs 118 mph 37 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 28.5 mpg vs 59 mpg 107% or 30.5 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 82 liters vs 68 liters 17% or 14 liters
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 690 kg 8% or 60 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2100 kg vs 1400 kg 33% or 700 kg

4 reasons to buy Volkswagen Jetta

Less CO2 emissions 68 g/mile vs 144 g/mile 112% or 76 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 510 liters vs 500 liters 2% or 10 liters
Other specs
Less weight 1320 kg vs 1860 kg 41% or 540 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 11 meters vs 12.2 meters 11% or 1.2 meters

Neutral reasons BMW 7-Series vs. Volkswagen Jetta

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 2979 cm3 vs 1598 cm3 46% or 1381 cm3 more
Fuel supply With a twin-turbocharged vs Common rail
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Length 5072 mm vs 4644 mm 8% or 428 mm shorter
Width 1902 mm vs 2020 mm 6% or 118 mm narrower
Height 1479 mm vs 1482 mm 0% or 3 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 3070 mm vs 2651 mm 14% or 419 mm more
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)