Last Update: Apr. 05, 2020, 5:08 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW Alpina and Cadillac Escalade

What is Better BMW Alpina or Cadillac Escalade?

Comparing BMW Alpina with Cadillac Escalade can help people decide which vehicle is worth buying. Our research found 9 ideas to go for BMW Alpina - it's above Cadillac Escalade, according to these specs. Anyway, Cadillac Escalade offers 18 weighty advantages that show it as a wonderful buy instead of BMW Alpina. There are vital options of BMW Alpina and Cadillac Escalade that were employed when making comparison. So we propose everyone compare two cars and figure out which one you'd like to purchase. Alpina was developed by BMW to outperform competitors in the class. If you had the chance, which car would you buy?

Exterior

BMW Alpina Cadillac Escalade

9 reasons to buy BMW Alpina

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 4 vs 2 2 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
Better compression 17.0 vs 10.5 38% or 6.5 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Performance
More top speed 145 mph vs 105 mph 40 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 97 g/mile vs 238 g/mile 145% or 141 g/mile
Less noise level 74 dB vs 75 dB 1% or 1 dB
Less CO emissions 0 g/mile vs 1 g/mile 0% or 1 g/mile
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1460 kg vs 2609 kg 79% or 1149 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 11.1 meters vs 11.9 meters 7% or 0.8 meters

18 reasons to buy Cadillac Escalade

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 8 vs 4 4 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Piston diameter larger 103.3 mm vs 84 mm 19% or 19.3 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 92 mm vs 90 mm 2% or 2 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

409 bhp vs 200 bhp

301 kw. vs 147 kw.

51% or 209 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 565 nM vs 410 nM 27% or 155 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 6.8 sec. vs 7.4 sec. 0.6 sec.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 17.4 mpg vs 47.87 mpg 175% or 30.47 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 23 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 161% or 37.05 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 12.3 mpg vs 35.81 mpg 191% or 23.51 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 479 liters vs 460 liters 4% or 19 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 98 liters vs 61 liters 38% or 37 liters
More maximum allowable weight 3221 kg vs 1980 kg 39% or 1241 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 612 kg vs 520 kg 15% or 92 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 745 kg 1% or 5 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 3100 kg vs 1600 kg 48% or 1500 kg
More maximum roof load 90 kg vs 75 kg 17% or 15 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
More seats 7 vs 5 2

Neutral reasons BMW Alpina vs. Cadillac Escalade

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 5700 RPM 30% or 1700 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 6162 cm3 68% or 4167 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs V8
Camshaft DOHC vs OHV
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4520 mm vs 5151 mm 12% or 631 mm shorter
Width 1817 mm vs 2008 mm 10% or 191 mm narrower
Height 1413 mm vs 1887 mm 25% or 474 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2946 mm 6% or 186 mm less
Front tires size 235/35 R19 vs 265/65 R18
Rear tires size 365/30 R19 vs 265/65 R18
Spare wheel mobile tire service kit vs 265/70 R17
Type of wheels 19" alloy wheels vs 18" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)