Last Update: Apr. 09, 2020, 5:42 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW Alpina and Fiat Panda

What is Better BMW Alpina or Fiat Panda?

Do you try to understand what vehicle is better: BMW Alpina or Fiat Panda? Our research revealed 9 factors to go for BMW Alpina - it's beating Fiat Panda, according to the arguments. For many motorists, Fiat Panda will still be a more suitable choice than BMW Alpina because there are 4 ideas of this. The comparison of BMW Alpina with Fiat Panda takes into account every needed spec and shows information. It might help you find the better choice - compare two cars before buying. BMW did a lot to present Alpina as the best car in its class. Though take into account that Panda has the effective developments of Fiat. If you had the chance, which car would you go for?


BMW Alpina Fiat Panda

9 reasons to buy BMW Alpina

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 4 vs 2 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

200 bhp vs 83 bhp

147 kw. vs

59% or 117 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.4 sec. vs 10.8 sec. 3.4 sec.
More top speed 145 mph vs 110 mph 35 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 47.87 mpg vs 59 mpg 23% or 11.13 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 460 liters vs 225 liters 51% or 235 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 61 liters vs 37 liters 39% or 24 liters
More maximum towing weight without brakes 745 kg vs 400 kg 46% or 345 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1600 kg vs 800 kg 50% or 800 kg

4 reasons to buy Fiat Panda

Less CO2 emissions 62 g/mile vs 97 g/mile 56% or 35 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Other specs
Less weight 1050 kg vs 1460 kg 39% or 410 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 9 meters vs 11.1 meters 23% or 2.1 meters

Neutral reasons BMW Alpina vs. Fiat Panda

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 875 cm3 56% or 1120 cm3 more
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Turbocharged
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Length 4520 mm vs 3653 mm 19% or 867 mm shorter
Width 1817 mm vs 1882 mm 3% or 65 mm narrower
Height 1413 mm vs 1551 mm 9% or 138 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2300 mm 17% or 460 mm more
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)