Last Update: Apr. 01, 2020, 5:28 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW Alpina and Kia Cerato

What is Better BMW Alpina or Kia Cerato?

Exterior

BMW Alpina Kia Cerato

14 reasons to buy BMW Alpina

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 84 mm vs 72.2 mm 14% or 11.8 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 90 mm vs 84.5 mm 6% or 5.5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

200 bhp vs 113 bhp

147 kw. vs 85 kw.

44% or 87 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 410 nM vs 255 nM 38% or 155 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.4 sec. vs 11.8 sec. 4.4 sec.
More top speed 145 mph vs 115 mph 30 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 47.87 mpg vs 56.46 mpg 18% or 8.59 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 60.05 mpg vs 67.24 mpg 12% or 7.19 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 35.81 mpg vs 43.46 mpg 21% or 7.65 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 61 liters vs 55 liters 10% or 6 liters
More maximum allowable weight 1980 kg vs 1815 kg 8% or 165 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 520 kg vs 185 kg 64% or 335 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 745 kg vs 550 kg 26% or 195 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1600 kg vs 1200 kg 25% or 400 kg

7 reasons to buy Kia Cerato

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.3 vs 17.0 2% or 0.3 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 82 g/mile vs 97 g/mile 18% or 15 g/mile
Less noise level 71 dB vs 74 dB 4% or 3 dB
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 538 liters vs 460 liters 14% or 78 liters
Warranty
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
Less weight 1309 kg vs 1460 kg 12% or 151 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.1 meters vs 11.1 meters 10% or 1 meters

Neutral reasons BMW Alpina vs. Kia Cerato

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 1582 cm3 21% or 413 cm3 more
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4520 mm vs 4340 mm 4% or 180 mm shorter
Width 1817 mm vs 1735 mm 5% or 82 mm wider
Height 1413 mm vs 1470 mm 4% or 57 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2610 mm 5% or 150 mm more
Front tires size 235/35 R19 vs 195/60 R15
Rear tires size 365/30 R19 vs 195/60 R15
Spare wheel mobile tire service kit vs 195/60 R15
Type of wheels 19" alloy wheels vs 15" steel
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)