Last Update: Apr. 03, 2020, 5:10 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW Alpina and Mitsubishi FTO

What is Better BMW Alpina or Mitsubishi FTO?

Comparing BMW Alpina with Mitsubishi FTO will help you make decision which car is better. There are 10 important reasons why BMW Alpina is surely a more advantageous purchase than Mitsubishi FTO. Anyway, Mitsubishi FTO offers 4 important advantages that show it as a wonderful choice instead of BMW Alpina. We gathered info about the vehicles to present a fair comparison of Mitsubishi FTO and BMW Alpina. Though Mitsubishi doesn't give up and offers its best technologies in FTO.

Exterior

BMW Alpina Mitsubishi FTO

10 reasons to buy BMW Alpina

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.0 vs 10.0 41% or 7 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 84 mm vs 78.4 mm 7% or 5.6 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 90 mm vs 69 mm 23% or 21 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

200 bhp vs 197 bhp

147 kw. vs 147 kw.

2% or 3 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 410 nM vs 200 nM 51% or 210 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
More top speed 145 mph vs 120 mph 25 mph
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 61 liters vs 60 liters 2% or 1 liters
More maximum allowable weight 1980 kg vs 1200 kg 39% or 780 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 6 years vs 3 years 50% or 3 years
Other specs
More seats 5 vs 4 1

4 reasons to buy Mitsubishi FTO

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 6 vs 4 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.3 sec. vs 7.4 sec. 0.1 sec.
Warranty
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
Less turning radius 5.3 meters vs 11.1 meters 109% or 5.8 meters

Neutral reasons BMW Alpina vs. Mitsubishi FTO

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 7500 RPM 47% or 3500 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 1998 cm3 0% or 3 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs V6
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4520 mm vs 4365 mm 3% or 155 mm shorter
Width 1817 mm vs 1735 mm 5% or 82 mm wider
Height 1413 mm vs 1300 mm 8% or 113 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2500 mm 9% or 260 mm more
Front tires size 235/35 R19 vs 205/50 R16
Rear tires size 365/30 R19 vs 205/50 R16
Spare wheel mobile tire service kit vs 205/50 R16
Type of wheels 19" alloy wheels vs alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)