Last Update: Apr. 05, 2020, 5:08 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW Alpina and Nissan Almera Tino

What is Better BMW Alpina or Nissan Almera Tino?

Comparing BMW Alpina with Nissan Almera Tino will help you make decision which vehicle is better. The comparison revealed 14 reasons to choose BMW Alpina - it's better than Nissan Almera Tino, according to the cases. Nissan Almera Tino also offers 9 ideas to choose it forgetting about BMW Alpina. By examining the most important characteristics, our team came up with evident distinctions of BMW Alpina and Nissan Almera Tino. So we suggest that you compare two cars and decide which vehicle you'd want to possess. Alpina was produced by BMW to outperform competitors in the class. The detailed match can't form any questions about deciding on a model.

Exterior

BMW Alpina Nissan Almera Tino

14 reasons to buy BMW Alpina

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.0 vs 9.5 44% or 7.5 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 84 mm vs 80 mm 5% or 4 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 90 mm vs 88 mm 2% or 2 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

200 bhp vs 115 bhp

147 kw. vs 85 kw.

43% or 85 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 410 nM vs 163 nM 60% or 247 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.4 sec. vs 11.6 sec. 4.2 sec.
More top speed 145 mph vs 107 mph 38 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 97 g/mile vs 114 g/mile 18% or 17 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 3 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 61 liters vs 60 liters 2% or 1 liters
More maximum allowable weight 1980 kg vs 1830 kg 8% or 150 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 745 kg vs 700 kg 6% or 45 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1600 kg vs 1250 kg 22% or 350 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles

9 reasons to buy Nissan Almera Tino

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 36.7 mpg vs 47.87 mpg 30% or 11.17 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 44.78 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 34% or 15.27 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 28.2 mpg vs 35.81 mpg 27% or 7.61 mpg
Emissions
Less noise level 72 dB vs 74 dB 3% or 2 dB
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 850 liters vs 460 liters 46% or 390 liters
More maximum bearing capacity 525 kg vs 520 kg 1% or 5 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
Less weight 1305 kg vs 1460 kg 12% or 155 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.6 meters vs 11.1 meters 5% or 0.5 meters

Neutral reasons BMW Alpina vs. Nissan Almera Tino

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 5600 RPM 29% or 1600 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 1769 cm3 11% or 226 cm3 more
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4520 mm vs 4264 mm 6% or 256 mm shorter
Width 1817 mm vs 1758 mm 3% or 59 mm wider
Height 1413 mm vs 1608 mm 12% or 195 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2535 mm 8% or 225 mm more
Front tires size 235/35 R19 vs 185/65 R15
Rear tires size 365/30 R19 vs 185/65 R15
Spare wheel mobile tire service kit vs 185/65 R15
Type of wheels 19" alloy wheels vs 6JX15" steel
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)