Last Update: Apr. 05, 2020, 5:08 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW Alpina and Nissan Maxima QX

What is Better BMW Alpina or Nissan Maxima QX?

Comparing BMW Alpina with Nissan Maxima QX might help drivers make it clear which vehicle is better. Our research found 12 ideas to purchase BMW Alpina - it's better than Nissan Maxima QX, according to these specs. But Nissan Maxima QX also has a lot of pluses: get to know 11 factors why it's better than BMW Alpina. The match of BMW Alpina with Nissan Maxima QX considers every single spec and shows information. It may help you decide on the more efficient option - compare two cars before making decision.

Exterior

BMW Alpina Nissan Maxima QX

12 reasons to buy BMW Alpina

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.0 vs 9.5 44% or 7.5 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 84 mm vs 76 mm 10% or 8 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 90 mm vs 73.3 mm 19% or 16.7 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

200 bhp vs 140 bhp

147 kw. vs 103 kw.

30% or 60 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 410 nM vs 179 nM 56% or 231 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.4 sec. vs 11.3 sec. 3.9 sec.
More top speed 145 mph vs 126 mph 19 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 97 g/mile vs 137 g/mile 41% or 40 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 3 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More maximum towing weight without brakes 745 kg vs 700 kg 6% or 45 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1600 kg vs 1500 kg 6% or 100 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles

11 reasons to buy Nissan Maxima QX

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 6 vs 4 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 30.69 mpg vs 47.87 mpg 56% or 17.18 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 38.69 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 55% or 21.36 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 23 mpg vs 35.81 mpg 56% or 12.81 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 70 liters vs 61 liters 13% or 9 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2015 kg vs 1980 kg 2% or 35 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 600 kg vs 520 kg 13% or 80 kg
More maximum roof load 100 kg vs 75 kg 25% or 25 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
Less weight 1415 kg vs 1460 kg 3% or 45 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.8 meters vs 11.1 meters 3% or 0.3 meters

Neutral reasons BMW Alpina vs. Nissan Maxima QX

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 6400 RPM 38% or 2400 less rpms.
Cylinders location In line vs V6
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4520 mm vs 4920 mm 8% or 400 mm shorter
Width 1817 mm vs 1780 mm 2% or 37 mm wider
Height 1413 mm vs 1435 mm 2% or 22 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2750 mm 0% or 10 mm more
Front tires size 235/35 R19 vs 215/55 R16
Rear tires size 365/30 R19 vs 215/55 R16
Spare wheel mobile tire service kit vs 215/55 R16
Type of wheels 19" alloy wheels vs 16 alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)