Last Update: Apr. 06, 2020, 5:51 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW Alpina and Nissan X-Trail

What is Better BMW Alpina or Nissan X-Trail?

Comparing BMW Alpina with Nissan X-Trail may help you make decision which vehicle is worth buying. There are 9 huge reasons why BMW Alpina is undoubtedly a more effective choice than Nissan X-Trail. Although Nissan X-Trail also has some advantages: get to know 12 ideas why it's better than BMW Alpina. Our team summarized information about the vehicles to provide a full comparison of Nissan X-Trail and BMW Alpina. It may help you decide on the more efficient choice - compare two cars before buying. BMW did great work to present Alpina as the most worthwhile model in its class. But X-Trail is impossible to see as an inferior car, as Nissan gave out a lot of money in the production. The overall match won't keep any hesitations about choosing a car.


BMW Alpina Nissan X-Trail

9 reasons to buy BMW Alpina

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.0 vs 15.6 8% or 1.4 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
More engine power

200 bhp vs 173 bhp

147 kw. vs 127 kw.

14% or 27 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 410 nM vs 360 nM 12% or 50 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.4 sec. vs 10 sec. 2.6 sec.
More top speed 145 mph vs 124 mph 21 mph
Less CO2 emissions 97 g/mile vs 123 g/mile 27% or 26 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More maximum bearing capacity 520 kg vs 519 kg 0% or 1 kg
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1460 kg vs 1651 kg 13% or 191 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

12 reasons to buy Nissan X-Trail

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 38.19 mpg vs 47.87 mpg 25% or 9.68 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 44.78 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 34% or 15.27 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 30.41 mpg vs 35.81 mpg 18% or 5.4 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 603 liters vs 460 liters 24% or 143 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 65 liters vs 61 liters 6% or 4 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2170 kg vs 1980 kg 9% or 190 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 745 kg 1% or 5 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2200 kg vs 1600 kg 27% or 600 kg
More maximum roof load 100 kg vs 75 kg 25% or 25 kg
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 6 years 50% or 6 years
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.8 meters vs 11.1 meters 3% or 0.3 meters

Neutral reasons BMW Alpina vs. Nissan X-Trail

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 3750 RPM 6% or 250 more rpms.
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Length 4520 mm vs 4630 mm 2% or 110 mm shorter
Width 1817 mm vs 1785 mm 2% or 32 mm wider
Height 1413 mm vs 1685 mm 16% or 272 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2630 mm 5% or 130 mm more
Front tires size 235/35 R19 vs 215/60 R17
Rear tires size 365/30 R19 vs 215/60 R17
Spare wheel mobile tire service kit vs 215/65 R16
Type of wheels 19" alloy wheels vs 17" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)