Last Update: Apr. 06, 2020, 5:51 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW Alpina and Nissan X-Trail

What is Better BMW Alpina or Nissan X-Trail?

Comparing BMW Alpina with Nissan X-Trail may help you make decision which vehicle is worth buying. There are 9 huge reasons why BMW Alpina is undoubtedly a more effective choice than Nissan X-Trail. Although Nissan X-Trail also has some advantages: get to know 12 ideas why it's better than BMW Alpina. Our team summarized information about the vehicles to provide a full comparison of Nissan X-Trail and BMW Alpina. It may help you decide on the more efficient choice - compare two cars before buying. BMW did great work to present Alpina as the most worthwhile model in its class. But X-Trail is impossible to see as an inferior car, as Nissan gave out a lot of money in the production. The overall match won't keep any hesitations about choosing a car.

Exterior

BMW Alpina Nissan X-Trail

9 reasons to buy BMW Alpina

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.0 vs 15.6 8% or 1.4 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
More engine power

200 bhp vs 173 bhp

147 kw. vs 127 kw.

14% or 27 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 410 nM vs 360 nM 12% or 50 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.4 sec. vs 10 sec. 2.6 sec.
More top speed 145 mph vs 124 mph 21 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 97 g/mile vs 123 g/mile 27% or 26 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More maximum bearing capacity 520 kg vs 519 kg 0% or 1 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1460 kg vs 1651 kg 13% or 191 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

12 reasons to buy Nissan X-Trail

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 38.19 mpg vs 47.87 mpg 25% or 9.68 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 44.78 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 34% or 15.27 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 30.41 mpg vs 35.81 mpg 18% or 5.4 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 603 liters vs 460 liters 24% or 143 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 65 liters vs 61 liters 6% or 4 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2170 kg vs 1980 kg 9% or 190 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 745 kg 1% or 5 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2200 kg vs 1600 kg 27% or 600 kg
More maximum roof load 100 kg vs 75 kg 25% or 25 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 6 years 50% or 6 years
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
Less turning radius 10.8 meters vs 11.1 meters 3% or 0.3 meters

Neutral reasons BMW Alpina vs. Nissan X-Trail

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 3750 RPM 6% or 250 more rpms.
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4520 mm vs 4630 mm 2% or 110 mm shorter
Width 1817 mm vs 1785 mm 2% or 32 mm wider
Height 1413 mm vs 1685 mm 16% or 272 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2630 mm 5% or 130 mm more
Front tires size 235/35 R19 vs 215/60 R17
Rear tires size 365/30 R19 vs 215/60 R17
Spare wheel mobile tire service kit vs 215/65 R16
Type of wheels 19" alloy wheels vs 17" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)