Last Update: Apr. 01, 2020, 5:28 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW Alpina and Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph

What is Better BMW Alpina or Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph?

Exterior

BMW Alpina Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph

9 reasons to buy BMW Alpina

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 4 vs 2 2 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
Better compression 17.0 vs 10.0 41% or 7 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston stroke longer 90 mm vs 79 mm 12% or 11 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Performance
More top speed 145 mph vs 140 mph 5 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 97 g/mile vs 252 g/mile 160% or 155 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 3 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 460 liters vs 374 liters 19% or 86 liters
Other specs
Less weight 1460 kg vs 2350 kg 61% or 890 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 11.1 meters vs 13.14 meters 18% or 2.04 meters

10 reasons to buy Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 12 vs 4 8 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Piston diameter larger 85 mm vs 84 mm 1% or 1 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

322 bhp vs 200 bhp

240 kw. vs 147 kw.

38% or 122 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 490 nM vs 410 nM 16% or 80 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.1 sec. vs 7.4 sec. 0.3 sec.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 16 mpg vs 47.87 mpg 199% or 31.87 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 22.1 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 172% or 37.95 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 11.1 mpg vs 35.81 mpg 223% or 24.71 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 100 liters vs 61 liters 39% or 39 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2810 kg vs 1980 kg 30% or 830 kg

Neutral reasons BMW Alpina vs. Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 5000 RPM 20% or 1000 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 5379 cm3 63% or 3384 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs V12
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4520 mm vs 5390 mm 16% or 870 mm shorter
Width 1817 mm vs 1930 mm 6% or 113 mm narrower
Height 1413 mm vs 1515 mm 7% or 102 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 3116 mm 11% or 356 mm less
Front tires size 235/35 R19 vs 235/65 WR16
Rear tires size 365/30 R19 vs 235/65 WR16
Spare wheel mobile tire service kit vs 235/65 WR16
Type of wheels 19" alloy wheels vs 7.0J X 16
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)