Last Update: Apr. 05, 2020, 5:08 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW Alpina and Toyota Camry

What is Better BMW Alpina or Toyota Camry?

Comparing BMW Alpina with Toyota Camry can help you decide which car is worth buying. We found 11 vital ideas why BMW Alpina is undoubtedly a more sensible choice than Toyota Camry. Although Toyota Camry also has got many pluses: look at 9 factors why it's better than BMW Alpina. The review of BMW Alpina and Toyota Camry considers every needed factor and summarizes data. It can help you find the suitable option - compare two cars before making decision. Alpina includes all the classical benefits of BMW. Car owners admit that Toyota really did a lot to turn Camry into a market success. The thorough review can't keep any hesitations about choosing a model.

Exterior

BMW Alpina Toyota Camry

11 reasons to buy BMW Alpina

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.0 vs 9.6 44% or 7.4 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
More engine power

200 bhp vs 150 bhp

147 kw. vs

25% or 50 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 410 nM vs 218 nM 47% or 192 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.4 sec. vs 9.4 sec. 2 sec.
More top speed 145 mph vs 130 mph 15 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 97 g/mile vs 128 g/mile 32% or 31 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 3 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More maximum allowable weight 1980 kg vs 1935 kg 2% or 45 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 745 kg vs 500 kg 33% or 245 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1460 kg vs 1470 kg 1% or 10 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.

9 reasons to buy Toyota Camry

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 88.5 mm vs 84 mm 5% or 4.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 96 mm vs 90 mm 6% or 6 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 32.78 mpg vs 47.87 mpg 46% or 15.09 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 40.9 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 47% or 19.15 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 24.11 mpg vs 35.81 mpg 49% or 11.7 mpg
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 70 liters vs 61 liters 13% or 9 liters
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 6 years 50% or 6 years
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
Less turning radius 5.6 meters vs 11.1 meters 98% or 5.5 meters

Neutral reasons BMW Alpina vs. Toyota Camry

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 5600 RPM 29% or 1600 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 2362 cm3 16% or 367 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Distributor fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4520 mm vs 4815 mm 6% or 295 mm shorter
Width 1817 mm vs 1795 mm 1% or 22 mm wider
Height 1413 mm vs 1500 mm 6% or 87 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2720 mm 1% or 40 mm more
Type of wheels 19" alloy wheels vs 16" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)