Last Update: Apr. 09, 2020, 5:42 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW Alpina and Toyota Starlet

What is Better BMW Alpina or Toyota Starlet?

Choosing between Toyota Starlet or BMW Alpina could be complicated, so we want to compare the models. You can see 12 huge reasons why BMW Alpina is undoubtedly a more beneficial buy than Toyota Starlet. Toyota Starlet anyway has got 6 ideas to buy it instead of BMW Alpina. The match of BMW Alpina and Toyota Starlet considers every needed point and summarizes information. Take acceleration or horse powers, measure size, and conveniently compare two cars. Alpina was produced by BMW to win competitions in the sphere. But remember that Starlet has got the individual developments of Toyota. If you had the chance, which vehicle would you buy?


BMW Alpina Toyota Starlet

12 reasons to buy BMW Alpina

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.0 vs 9.6 44% or 7.4 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 84 mm vs 74 mm 12% or 10 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 90 mm vs 77.4 mm 14% or 12.6 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

200 bhp vs 74 bhp

147 kw. vs

63% or 126 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.4 sec. vs 11.9 sec. 4.5 sec.
More top speed 145 mph vs 103 mph 42 mph
Less CO2 emissions 97 g/mile vs 101 g/mile 4% or 4 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 4 vs EURO 2 2 generations
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 460 liters vs 214 liters 53% or 246 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 61 liters vs 45 liters 26% or 16 liters
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1600 kg vs 900 kg 44% or 700 kg
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles

6 reasons to buy Toyota Starlet

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 41.48 mpg vs 47.87 mpg 15% or 6.39 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 50.43 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 19% or 9.62 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 32.11 mpg vs 35.81 mpg 12% or 3.7 mpg
More standard warranty - Years 3 years vs 2 years 33% or 1 years
Other specs
Less weight 830 kg vs 1460 kg 76% or 630 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 9.2 meters vs 11.1 meters 21% or 1.9 meters

Neutral reasons BMW Alpina vs. Toyota Starlet

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 5400 RPM 26% or 1400 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 1332 cm3 33% or 663 cm3 more
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs SOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Length 4520 mm vs 3740 mm 17% or 780 mm shorter
Width 1817 mm vs 1635 mm 10% or 182 mm wider
Height 1413 mm vs 1378 mm 2% or 35 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2300 mm 17% or 460 mm more
Front tires size 235/35 R19 vs 195/45 R15
Rear tires size 365/30 R19 vs 195/45 R15
Spare wheel mobile tire service kit vs 195/45 R15
Type of wheels 19" alloy wheels vs alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)