Last Update: Apr. 05, 2020, 5:08 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW Alpina and Toyota Urban Cruiser

What is Better BMW Alpina or Toyota Urban Cruiser?

Comparing BMW Alpina with Toyota Urban Cruiser can help drivers make it clear which vehicle is worth buying. You can see 17 vital arguments why BMW Alpina is actually a more effective buy than Toyota Urban Cruiser. Toyota Urban Cruiser still shows 7 reasons to purchase it instead of BMW Alpina. Our team summarized information about the models to introduce a fair match of Toyota Urban Cruiser and BMW Alpina. It can help you choose the better choice - compare two cars before paying money. Though Urban Cruiser is uneasy to call a less worthy vehicle, as Toyota invested a lot of money in the project. The detailed comparison won't form any hesitations about deciding on a vehicle.

Exterior

BMW Alpina Toyota Urban Cruiser

17 reasons to buy BMW Alpina

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.0 vs 11.5 32% or 5.5 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 84 mm vs 72.5 mm 14% or 11.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 90 mm vs 80.5 mm 11% or 9.5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

200 bhp vs 101 bhp

147 kw. vs 74 kw.

50% or 99 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 410 nM vs 132 nM 68% or 278 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.4 sec. vs 12.5 sec. 5.1 sec.
More top speed 145 mph vs 109 mph 36 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 47.87 mpg vs 50.43 mpg 5% or 2.56 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 35.81 mpg vs 42.22 mpg 18% or 6.41 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 460 liters vs 314 liters 32% or 146 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 61 liters vs 42 liters 31% or 19 liters
More maximum allowable weight 1980 kg vs 1590 kg 20% or 390 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 520 kg vs 450 kg 13% or 70 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 745 kg vs 550 kg 26% or 195 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1600 kg vs 800 kg 50% or 800 kg
More maximum roof load 75 kg vs 40 kg 47% or 35 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 99441 miles 90% or 894965 miles

7 reasons to buy Toyota Urban Cruiser

Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 56.46 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 6% or 3.59 mpg
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 80 g/mile vs 97 g/mile 21% or 17 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 12 years vs 6 years 50% or 6 years
More standard warranty - Years 5 years vs 2 years 60% or 3 years
Other specs
Less weight 1140 kg vs 1460 kg 28% or 320 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 11 meters vs 11.1 meters 1% or 0.1 meters

Neutral reasons BMW Alpina vs. Toyota Urban Cruiser

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 6000 RPM 33% or 2000 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 1329 cm3 33% or 666 cm3 more
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4520 mm vs 3930 mm 13% or 590 mm shorter
Width 1817 mm vs 1725 mm 5% or 92 mm wider
Height 1413 mm vs 1525 mm 7% or 112 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2460 mm 11% or 300 mm more
Front tires size 235/35 R19 vs 195/60 R16
Rear tires size 365/30 R19 vs 195/60 R16
Spare wheel mobile tire service kit vs Compact
Type of wheels 19" alloy wheels vs 16" alloy wheels
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)