Last Update: Apr. 09, 2020, 5:42 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW X1 and Kia Cerato

What is Better BMW X1 or Kia Cerato?

Do you want to get to know which model is better: BMW X1 or Kia Cerato? The comparison found 14 ideas to purchase BMW X1 - it's above Kia Cerato, according to such arguments. Kia Cerato anyway has got 7 factors to purchase it forgetting about BMW X1. The match of BMW X1 with Kia Cerato considers every vital factor and shows data. You may compare two cars and express your personal opinion about them. X1 was built by BMW to outperform contestants in the sphere. But don't forget that Cerato includes the effective developments of Kia. Which of the vehicles in our review would you buy?

Exterior

BMW X1 Kia Cerato

14 reasons to buy BMW X1

Engine and transmission
Piston diameter larger 84 mm vs 72.2 mm 14% or 11.8 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 90 mm vs 84.5 mm 6% or 5.5 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

143 bhp vs 113 bhp

105 kw. vs 85 kw.

21% or 30 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 320 nM vs 255 nM 20% or 65 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.6 sec. vs 11.8 sec. 2.2 sec.
More top speed 124 mph vs 115 mph 9 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 54.25 mpg vs 56.46 mpg 4% or 2.21 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 60.05 mpg vs 67.24 mpg 12% or 7.19 mpg
Emissions
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 61 liters vs 55 liters 10% or 6 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2030 kg vs 1815 kg 11% or 215 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 560 kg vs 185 kg 67% or 375 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 550 kg 27% or 200 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1800 kg vs 1200 kg 33% or 600 kg

7 reasons to buy Kia Cerato

Engine and transmission
Better compression 17.3 vs 16.5 5% or 0.8 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (City) 43.46 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 6% or 2.81 mpg
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 82 g/mile vs 85 g/mile 4% or 3 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 538 liters vs 420 liters 22% or 118 liters
More maximum trunk space 1494 liters vs 1350 liters 10% or 144 liters
Other specs
Less weight 1309 kg vs 1470 kg 12% or 161 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.1 meters vs 11.3 meters 12% or 1.2 meters

Neutral reasons BMW X1 vs. Kia Cerato

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 1582 cm3 21% or 413 cm3 more
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs COMMON RAIL
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4454 mm vs 4340 mm 3% or 114 mm shorter
Width 1798 mm vs 1735 mm 4% or 63 mm wider
Height 1545 mm vs 1470 mm 5% or 75 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2610 mm 5% or 150 mm more
Front tires size 225/50 R17 vs 195/60 R15
Rear tires size 225/50 R17 vs 195/60 R15
Spare wheel BMW mobile system for tire maintenance vs 195/60 R15
Type of wheels 17" alloy wheels vs 15" steel
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)