Last Update: Apr. 05, 2020, 5:08 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW X1 and Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin

What is Better BMW X1 or Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin?

Comparing BMW X1 with Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin will help you make it clear which car is worth buying. We found 14 weighty arguments why BMW X1 is undoubtedly a more effective buy than Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin. Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin anyway has got 7 ideas to buy it forgetting about BMW X1. By looking at the most prominent specs, we came up with the main distinctions of BMW X1 and Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin. Compare steering or horse powers, measure dimensions, and conveniently compare two cars. X1 includes all the appreciated pluses of BMW.

Exterior

BMW X1 Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin

14 reasons to buy BMW X1

Engine and transmission
Better compression 16.5 vs 11.0 33% or 5.5 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 84 mm vs 81.5 mm 3% or 2.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More engine power

143 bhp vs 127 bhp

105 kw. vs 95 kw.

11% or 16 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 320 nM vs 190 nM 41% or 130 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 9.6 sec. vs 10.8 sec. 1.2 sec.
More top speed 124 mph vs 106 mph 18 mph
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 85 g/mile vs 141 g/mile 66% or 56 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 3 2 generations
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 420 liters vs 358 liters 15% or 62 liters
More maximum trunk space 1350 liters vs 1158 liters 14% or 192 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 61 liters vs 53 liters 13% or 8 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2030 kg vs 1890 kg 7% or 140 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 560 kg vs 500 kg 11% or 60 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1800 kg vs 1500 kg 17% or 300 kg

7 reasons to buy Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin

Engine and transmission
Piston stroke longer 95.8 mm vs 90 mm 6% or 5.8 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 29.69 mpg vs 54.25 mpg 83% or 24.56 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 35.28 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 70% or 24.77 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 23.21 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 99% or 23.06 mpg
Weight and capacity
More maximum roof load 80 kg vs 75 kg 6% or 5 kg
Other specs
Less weight 1390 kg vs 1470 kg 6% or 80 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.4 meters vs 11.3 meters 9% or 0.9 meters

Neutral reasons BMW X1 vs. Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 5000 RPM 20% or 1000 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 1999 cm3 0% or 4 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Direct fuel injection
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 5 1 more
Dimensions
Length 4454 mm vs 4035 mm 9% or 419 mm shorter
Width 1798 mm vs 1695 mm 6% or 103 mm wider
Height 1545 mm vs 1735 mm 11% or 190 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2450 mm 11% or 310 mm more
Front tires size 225/50 R17 vs 215/65 R16 98S
Rear tires size 225/50 R17 vs 215/65 R16 98S
Spare wheel BMW mobile system for tire maintenance vs 215/65 R16 98S
Type of wheels 17" alloy wheels vs 16"X6.0J alloy wheels
Style of wheels star shaped spokes vs 5 spokes
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)