Last Update: Apr. 05, 2020, 5:08 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW X1 and Skoda Fabia

What is Better BMW X1 or Skoda Fabia?

Comparing BMW X1 with Skoda Fabia can help buyers decide which model is better. We found 10 weighty ideas why BMW X1 is actually a more sensible choice than Skoda Fabia. But Skoda Fabia also has got many advantages: think about 11 points why it's better than BMW X1. The review of BMW X1 and Skoda Fabia considers every vital point and sums up information. So our experts suggest that visitors compare two cars and figure out which one you'd want to possess. X1 includes all the usual benefits of BMW. Nevertheless Skoda doesn't fall behind and offers its best technologies in Fabia. Which of the models in our match would you choose?


BMW X1 Skoda Fabia

10 reasons to buy BMW X1

Engine and transmission
Better compression 16.5 vs 10.0 39% or 6.5 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 84 mm vs 76.5 mm 9% or 7.5 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Piston stroke longer 90 mm vs 75.6 mm 16% or 14.4 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More torque 320 nM vs 250 nM 22% or 70 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Less CO2 emissions 85 g/mile vs 92 g/mile 8% or 7 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More capacity of fuel tank 61 liters vs 45 liters 26% or 16 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2030 kg vs 1713 kg 16% or 317 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 560 kg vs 400 kg 29% or 160 kg
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Service cycle
More service interval - Mileage 37290 miles vs 9323 miles 75% or 27967 miles

11 reasons to buy Skoda Fabia

Engine and transmission
More engine power

180 bhp vs 143 bhp

132 kw. vs 105 kw.

21% or 37 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.3 sec. vs 9.6 sec. 2.3 sec.
More top speed 140 mph vs 124 mph 16 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 45.56 mpg vs 54.25 mpg 19% or 8.69 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 54.25 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 11% or 5.8 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 36.7 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 26% or 9.57 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 480 liters vs 420 liters 13% or 60 liters
More maximum trunk space 1460 liters vs 1350 liters 8% or 110 liters
More warranty against corrosion 10 years vs 6 years 40% or 4 years
Other specs
Less weight 1313 kg vs 1470 kg 12% or 157 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10 meters vs 11.3 meters 13% or 1.3 meters

Neutral reasons BMW X1 vs. Skoda Fabia

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 6200 RPM 35% or 2200 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 1390 cm3 30% or 605 cm3 more
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 6 vs 7 1 less
Length 4454 mm vs 4276 mm 4% or 178 mm shorter
Width 1798 mm vs 1642 mm 9% or 156 mm wider
Height 1545 mm vs 1448 mm 6% or 97 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2454 mm 11% or 306 mm more
Front tires size 225/50 R17 vs 205/40 R17
Rear tires size 225/50 R17 vs 205/40 R17
Spare wheel BMW mobile system for tire maintenance vs Compact
Type of wheels 17" alloy wheels vs 17" alloy wheels
Style of wheels star shaped spokes vs GIGARO
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)