Last Update: Apr. 02, 2020, 5:43 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW X1 and Volvo V50

What is Better BMW X1 or Volvo V50?

Comparing BMW X1 with Volvo V50 can help people make decision which model is worth buying. There are 12 weighty reasons why BMW X1 is surely a more beneficial buy than Volvo V50. Though Volvo V50 also has got some benefits: get to know 9 factors why its winning BMW X1. There are vital characteristics of BMW X1 and Volvo V50 that were employed when comparing.So we suggest that visitors compare two cars and make up your mind which model youd want to possess. X1 was developed by BMW to win contestants on the market. But doesnt lag behind and presents its new technologies in V50.


BMW X1 Volvo V50

12 reasons to buy BMW X1

Engine and transmission
Piston stroke longer 90 mm vs 88 mm 2% or 2 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

143 bhp vs 136 bhp

105 kw. vs 100 kw.

5% or 7 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Less CO2 emissions 85 g/mile vs 96 g/mile 13% or 11 g/mile
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 420 liters vs 417 liters 1% or 3 liters
More maximum trunk space 1350 liters vs 717 liters 47% or 633 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 61 liters vs 52 liters 15% or 9 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2030 kg vs 1960 kg 3% or 70 kg
More maximum bearing capacity 560 kg vs 556 kg 1% or 4 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 750 kg vs 700 kg 7% or 50 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 1800 kg vs 1500 kg 17% or 300 kg
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles

9 reasons to buy Volvo V50

Engine and transmission
Better compression 18.5 vs 16.5 11% or 2 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 85 mm vs 84 mm 1% or 1 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
More top speed 130 mph vs 124 mph 6 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 48.66 mpg vs 54.25 mpg 11% or 5.59 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 58.85 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 2% or 1.2 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 37.22 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 24% or 9.05 mpg
More warranty against corrosion 8 years vs 6 years 25% or 2 years
Other specs
Less weight 1404 kg vs 1470 kg 5% or 66 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 10.6 meters vs 11.3 meters 7% or 0.7 meters

Neutral reasons BMW X1 vs. Volvo V50

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 1997 cm3 0% or 2 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Length 4454 mm vs 4514 mm 1% or 60 mm shorter
Width 1798 mm vs 1770 mm 2% or 28 mm wider
Height 1545 mm vs 1452 mm 6% or 93 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2640 mm 4% or 120 mm more
Front tires size 225/50 R17 vs 205/55 R16
Rear tires size 225/50 R17 vs 205/55 R16
Spare wheel BMW mobile system for tire maintenance vs ORARY
Type of wheels 17" alloy wheels vs 16" alloy wheels
Style of wheels star shaped spokes vs CYGNUS
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)