Last Update: Apr. 02, 2020, 5:43 a.m.
Home >>> >>> BMW X1 and Volvo XC70

What is Better BMW X1 or Volvo XC70?

Comparing BMW X1 with Volvo XC70 will help drivers decide which car is better.We revealed 7 ideas to choose BMW X1 its better than Volvo XC70, according to the arguments. Nevertheless, Volvo XC70 shows 16 weighty benefits that turn it into great choice instead of BMW X1. We can name important specs of BMW X1 and Volvo XC70 that were used when comparing. Take acceleration or fuel consumption, look at wheel base, and conveniently compare two cars. X1 was produced by BMW to outperform competitions in the class.

Exterior

BMW X1 Volvo XC70

7 reasons to buy BMW X1

Engine and transmission
Better compression 16.5 vs 9.3 44% or 7.2 . The greater degree of compression = the less fuel need to produce the same power.
Piston diameter larger 84 mm vs 82 mm 2% or 2 mm larger. The larger diameter of cylinder = the greater filling ratio. Cons: increase emissions of toxic substances.
Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 85 g/mile vs 167 g/mile 96% or 82 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More maximum bearing capacity 560 kg vs 501 kg 11% or 59 kg
Warranty
More standard warranty - Mileage 994406 miles vs 62150 miles 94% or 932256 miles
Other specs
Less weight 1470 kg vs 1909 kg 30% or 439 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 11.3 meters vs 11.5 meters 2% or 0.2 meters

16 reasons to buy Volvo XC70

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 6 vs 4 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
Piston stroke longer 93.2 mm vs 90 mm 3% or 3.2 mm. The longer stroke = lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions.
More engine power

285 bhp vs 143 bhp

210 kw. vs 105 kw.

50% or 142 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 400 nM vs 320 nM 20% or 80 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.6 sec. vs 9.6 sec. 2 sec.
More top speed 130 mph vs 124 mph 6 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 24.61 mpg vs 54.25 mpg 120% or 29.64 mpg
Less fuel consumption (Highway) 33.19 mpg vs 60.05 mpg 81% or 26.86 mpg
Less fuel consumption (City) 17 mpg vs 46.27 mpg 172% or 29.27 mpg
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 815 liters vs 420 liters 48% or 395 liters
More maximum trunk space 1600 liters vs 1350 liters 16% or 250 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 70 liters vs 61 liters 13% or 9 liters
More maximum allowable weight 2410 kg vs 2030 kg 16% or 380 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2000 kg vs 1800 kg 10% or 200 kg
More maximum roof load 100 kg vs 75 kg 25% or 25 kg
Warranty
More warranty against corrosion 8 years vs 6 years 25% or 2 years

Neutral reasons BMW X1 vs. Volvo XC70

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4000 RPM vs 5600 RPM 29% or 1600 less rpms.
Engine capacity 1995 cm3 vs 2953 cm3 32% or 958 cm3 less
Cylinders location In line vs In line
Camshaft DOHC vs DOHC
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Dimensions
Length 4454 mm vs 4838 mm 8% or 384 mm shorter
Width 1798 mm vs 1861 mm 3% or 63 mm narrower
Height 1545 mm vs 1421 mm 8% or 124 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2760 mm vs 2815 mm 2% or 55 mm less
Front tires size 225/50 R17 vs 235/55 R17
Rear tires size 225/50 R17 vs 235/55 R17
Spare wheel BMW mobile system for tire maintenance vs repair kit
Type of wheels 17" alloy wheels vs 17" alloy wheels
Style of wheels star shaped spokes vs SARGAS
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)