What is better BMW X3 or Volvo XC60?


Comparing BMW X3 with Volvo XC60 can help people make it clear which model is more efficient. There are 14 huge ideas why BMW X3 is undoubtedly a more sensible buy than Volvo XC60. Volvo XC60 still shows 6 reasons to purchase it rather than BMW X3. The match of BMW X3 with Volvo XC60 considers every needed factor and shows information. Choose acceleration or efficiency, measure dimensions, and conveniently compare two cars. But Volvo doesn't lag behind and presents its best developments in XC60.


BMW X3
Volvo XC60
BMW X3
Volvo XC60

14 reasons to buy BMW X3

  1. More cylinders
    2 more cylinders. The more cylinders, the greater the engine stability with less vibration. Engine efficiency increases due to shorter pauses between strokes.
    6 cylinders 4 cylinders
  2. Piston stroke longer
    1% or 1.4 mm longer. The longer the piston stroke, the better the engine’s fuel combustion efficiency. This reduces fuel consumption and creates a more environmentally-friendly engine.
    94.6 mm Piston stroke 93.2 mm Piston stroke
  3. More engine power
    31% or 110 hp more. The greater the vehicle's power, the better the acceleration. Also, powerful cars provide higher speeds.
    360 hp / 265kW engine power 250 hp / 184kW engine power
  4. More torque
    30% or 150 Nm more. The higher the torque, the faster the acceleration.
    500 Nm @ 1850-5000 Rpm torque 350 Nm @ 1800-4800 Rpm torque
  5. Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph
    2.1 sec faster. The faster the acceleration, the faster the driver can reach optimal speed, though this can contribute to greater fuel consumption.
    4.8 sec acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 6.9 sec acceleration from 0 to 60 mph
  6. More top speed
    40 km/h more. The higher the top speed, the faster the car travels on the highway.
    250 km/h / 155mph top speed 210 km/h / 130mph top speed
  7. More engine capacity
    34% or 1029 cc more The greater the engine capacity, the lower the wear and tear. Larger engine capacities provide longer vehicle lifespans.
    2998 cc engine capacity 1969 cc engine capacity
  8. Faster acceleration from 0 to 100 kmh
    44% or 2.1 sec faster. The faster the acceleration, the faster the driver can reach optimal speed, though this can contribute to greater fuel consumption.
    4.8 sec acceleration from 0 to 100 kmh 6.9 sec acceleration from 0 to 100 kmh
  9. More capacity of fuel tank
    8% or 5 l more. The greater the fuel tank capacity, the further the vehicle can travel without refueling.
    65 l capacity of fuel tank 60 l capacity of fuel tank
  10. More minimum boot capacity
    8% or 45 l more. The lower the trunk capacity, the fewer items a driver can store in the vehicle without lowering the rear seats.
    550 l minimum boot capacity 505 l minimum boot capacity
  11. More maximum trunk space
    11% or 168 l more. The greater the trunk capacity, the more items a driver can store in the vehicle without lowering the rear seats.
    1600 l maximum trunk space 1432 l maximum trunk space
  12. More maximum towing weight with brakes
    4% or 100 kg more. The greater the permitted trailer load with brakes, the more the vehicle can tow larger and heavier trailers without damaging the engine.
    2400 kg / 5286lbs maximum towing weight with brakes 2300 kg / 5066lbs maximum towing weight with brakes
  13. Less weight
    4% or 82 kg less. Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
    1845 kg / 4064lbs weight 1927 kg / 4244lbs weight
  14. Shorter wheelbase
    1 mm shorter. The shorter the wheelbase, the better the vehicle’s cross-country driving range. Also, shorter wheel-based cars are easier to steer out of a skid.
    2864 mm wheelbase 2865 mm wheelbase

6 reasons to buy Volvo XC60

  1. Better compression
    6% or 0.6 more. The higher the compression ratio, the less fuel is required to achieve the same power. This can affect the engine's efficiency.
    10.2 compression 10.8 compression
  2. Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle)
    10% or 0.8 l/100 km less. The lower the fuel consumption, the lower the exhaust emitted into the air. Economical cars are also more efficient to drive.
    7.9-8.2 l/100 km / 29.8mpg fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 7.1-7.3 l/100 km / 33.1mpg fuel consumption (Combined cycle)
  3. Less fuel consumption (Highway)
    10% or 0.7 l/100 km less. The lower the fuel consumption, the lower the pollution-causing emissions. Also, drivers save money by using an economical car.
    6.8-7.2 l/100 km / 34.6mpg fuel consumption (Highway) 6.1-6.2 l/100 km / 38.6mpg fuel consumption (Highway)
  4. Less fuel consumption (City)
    9% or 0.9 l/100 km less. The lower the fuel consumption, the more economical it is to drive the vehicle. Also, economical cars are more environmentally-friendly.
    9.8-10.1 l/100 km / 24mpg fuel consumption (City) 8.9-9.1 l/100 km / 26.4mpg fuel consumption (City)
  5. Less drag coefficient Cd
    3% or 0.01 less. The lower the drag coefficient (Cd), the less fuel is consumed. Also, emissions are reduced due to less fuel used. A low drag coefficient improves a vehicle’s maximum speed.
    0.33 drag coefficient Cd 0.32 drag coefficient Cd
  6. Less CO2 emissions
    8% or 14 g/km less. The less CO2 emission the vehicle releases, the less damage to the environment it causes.
    179-187 g/km / 288g/mile CO2 emissions 165-169 g/km / 266g/mile CO2 emissions

Neutral reasons BMW X3 vs. Volvo XC60

  1. Engine position
    Front, Longitudinal Engine position Front, Transverse Engine position
  2. Cylinders location
    Inline Cylinders location Inline Cylinders location
  3. Fuel supply
    Direct injection Fuel supply Direct injection Fuel supply
  4. doors
    5 doors 5 doors
  5. width including mirrors
    2138 mm width including mirrors 2117 mm width including mirrors
  6. Length
    BMW X3 is 28 mm longer
    4716 mm Length 4688 mm Length
  7. Width
    Volvo XC60 is 5 mm wider
    1897 mm Width 1902 mm Width
  8. Height
    BMW X3 is 18 mm higher
    1676 mm Height 1658 mm Height
  9. ride height The greater the ride height, the better the vehicle’s cross-country driving range.
    204 mm ride height 216 mm ride height
  10. Front tires size
    Front wheel tires: 2 Front tires size 1649-1668 mm Front tires size
Engine and transmission
cylinders
6
cylinders
4
valves per cylinder
4
valves per cylinder
4
compression
10.2
compression
10.8
Piston stroke
94.6 mm
Piston stroke
93.2 mm
Engine position
Front, Longitudinal
Engine position
Front, Transverse
Cylinders location
Inline
Cylinders location
Inline
cylinder bore
82 mm
cylinder bore
82 mm
gears automatic transmission
8 Steptronic
gears automatic transmission
8
Performance
engine power
360 hp @ 5200-6500 Rpm
265kW
engine power
250 hp @ 5500 rpm.
184kW
torque
500 Nm @ 1850-5000 Rpm
torque
350 Nm @ 1800-4800 Rpm
acceleration from 0 to 60 mph
4.8 sec
acceleration from 0 to 60 mph
6.9 sec
top speed
250 km/h
155mph
top speed
210 km/h
130mph
engine capacity
2998 cc
engine capacity
1969 cc
acceleration from 0 to 100 kmh
4.8 sec
acceleration from 0 to 100 kmh
6.9 sec
Fuel consumption
fuel consumption (Combined cycle)
7.9-8.2 l/100 km
29.8mpg
fuel consumption (Combined cycle)
7.1-7.3 l/100 km
33.1mpg
fuel consumption (Highway)
6.8-7.2 l/100 km
34.6mpg
fuel consumption (Highway)
6.1-6.2 l/100 km
38.6mpg
fuel consumption (City)
9.8-10.1 l/100 km
24mpg
fuel consumption (City)
8.9-9.1 l/100 km
26.4mpg
capacity of fuel tank
65 l
capacity of fuel tank
60 l
Fuel supply
Direct injection
Fuel supply
Direct injection
drag coefficient Cd
0.33
drag coefficient Cd
0.32
Emissions
CO2 emissions
179-187 g/km
288g/mile
CO2 emissions
165-169 g/km
266g/mile
european emission standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
european emission standard
Euro 6d-Temp
Weight and capacity
minimum boot capacity
550 l
minimum boot capacity
505 l
maximum trunk space
1600 l
maximum trunk space
1432 l
maximum towing weight without brakes
750 kg
1652lbs
maximum towing weight without brakes
750 kg
1652lbs
maximum towing weight with brakes
2400 kg
5286lbs
maximum towing weight with brakes
2300 kg
5066lbs
weight
1845 kg
4064lbs
weight
1927 kg
4244lbs
seats
5
seats
5
Other specs
turning radius
12.1 m
turning radius
11.8 m
doors
5
doors
5
width including mirrors
2138 mm
width including mirrors
2117 mm
Dimensions
Length
4716 mm
Length
4688 mm
Width
1897 mm
Width
1902 mm
Height
1676 mm
Height
1658 mm
wheelbase
2864 mm
wheelbase
2865 mm
ride height
204 mm
ride height
216 mm
Wheels and tires
Front tires size
Front wheel tires: 2
Front tires size
1649-1668 mm
View full list
Comparing BMW X3 with Volvo XC60 can help people make it clear which model is more efficient. There are 14 huge ideas why BMW X3 is undoubtedly a more sensible buy than Volvo XC60. Volvo XC60 still shows 6 reasons to purchase it rather than BMW X3. The match of BMW X3 with Volvo XC60 considers every needed factor and shows information. Choose acceleration or efficiency, measure dimensions, and conveniently compare two cars. But Volvo doesn't lag behind and presents its best developments in XC60.

Comparison of BMW X3 and Volvo XC60: conclusions and opinions

So let's view some important facts about Volvo XC60 and BMW X3. The most important specs are given in this review. Learn the data about Volvo XC60 and BMW X3, which can help you make decision.

General Review of BMW X3 vs. Volvo XC60

There are both big and tiny differences in these two cars. There was a period when BMW produced quite a lot of X3 vehicles. But Volvo with its XC60, actually gives great opportunities and takes a lead in some cases. Drivers often estimate the length and other dimensions at first. Match it with 1658 mm of height, 1902 mm of width, and 4688 mm of length of Volvo XC60. Eventually, compare wheelbases, which are 2864 mm vs. 2865 mm for BMW X3 and Volvo XC60 respectively.

It's actually worth looking at motors of the cars. The output of BMW X3 motor is 360 hp @ 5200-6500 rpm,and it possesses 6 cylinders. There's a 4 -cylinder engine in Volvo XC60 with average of 250 hp @ 5500 rpm. of output. BMW X3 only takes 4.6 sec for driving at 60 mph, Volvo XC60 takes 6.6 sec to provide the same speed. Also, don't forget about the maximum speed of 250 km/h for X3 and compare it to 210 km/h for XC60.

Safety of BMW X3 in comparison with Volvo XC60

Active and passive safety is on great scale for both models. The newest set of options of BMW guards drivers and passengers in BMW X3. That's why X3 takes a lead in a lot of safety comparisons. The safety features of Volvo XC60 are excellent for pedestrians. Motorists who search for safe car use often bought Volvo. In addition, XC60 offers great braking and steering systems for wider safety.

Conclusion and opinions

You can't state for sure if BMW X3 is much better than Volvo XC60. But here are dozens of advantages and drawbacks. Look at X3 browsing 14 obvious privileges to buy it, but remember about the 6 privileges of XC60. If you're a follower of BMW, then you'll find more minuses of Volvo, but try to be fair when looking at these vehicles.