What is Better Cadillac SRX or Ford Explorer?
Exterior
14 reasons to buy Cadillac SRX
| Engine and transmission |
| More engine power |
258 bhp vs 204 bhp
190 kw. vs 150 kw.
|
21% or 54 bhp. More power of car = more top speed. |
| More torque |
339 nM vs 318 nM |
6% or 21 nM. More torque = faster acceleration. |
| Performance |
| Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph |
8.1 sec. vs 10.9 sec. |
2.8 sec. |
| More top speed |
125 mph vs 120 mph |
5 mph |
| Fuel consumption |
| Less fuel consumption (City) |
15 mpg vs 15.5 mpg |
3% or 0.5 mpg |
| Emissions |
| Less CO2 emissions |
197 g/mile vs 218 g/mile |
11% or 21 g/mile |
| Higher european emission standard |
EURO 4 vs EURO 2 |
2 generations |
| Weight and capacity |
| More capacity of fuel tank |
76 liters vs 75.8 liters |
0% or 0.2 liters |
| More maximum allowable weight |
2725 kg vs 2530 kg |
7% or 195 kg |
| More maximum bearing capacity |
729 kg vs 450 kg |
38% or 279 kg |
| More maximum roof load |
100 kg vs 90 kg |
10% or 10 kg |
| Warranty |
| More painted surfaces warranty |
3 years vs 1 years |
67% or 2 years |
| Other specs |
| Less weight |
1996 kg vs 2080 kg |
4% or 84 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc. |
| More seats |
7 vs 5 |
2 |
5 reasons to buy Ford Explorer
| Fuel consumption |
| Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) |
20.59 mpg vs 21.11 mpg |
3% or 0.52 mpg |
| Less fuel consumption (Highway) |
25.4 mpg vs 27.7 mpg |
9% or 2.3 mpg |
| Emissions |
| Less noise level |
72 dB vs 74 dB |
3% or 2 dB |
| Weight and capacity |
| More maximum towing weight with brakes |
2550 kg vs 2268 kg |
11% or 282 kg |
| Other specs |
| Less turning radius |
11.5 meters vs 12.1 meters |
5% or 0.6 meters |
Neutral reasons Cadillac SRX vs. Ford Explorer
| Engine and transmission |
| Engine speed (RPM) |
6500 RPM vs 5250 RPM |
19% or 1250 more rpms. |
| Engine capacity |
3564 cm3 vs 4008 cm3 |
11% or 444 cm3 less |
| Cylinders location |
V6 vs V6 |
|
| Camshaft |
DOHC vs SOHC |
|
| Fuel supply |
Distributor fuel injection vs Fuel injection |
|
| Turbocharging |
Yes vs Yes |
|
| Dimensions |
| Length |
4950 mm vs 4813 mm |
3% or 137 mm shorter |
| Width |
1845 mm vs 1874 mm |
2% or 29 mm narrower |
| Height |
1685 mm vs 1801 mm |
6% or 116 mm lower |
| Wheels and tires |
| Wheelbase |
2957 mm vs 2835 mm |
4% or 122 mm more |
| Front tires size |
235/65 R17 vs P255/70HRx16BSW |
|
| Rear tires size |
225/60 R17 vs P255/70HRx16BSW |
|
| Spare wheel |
Compact vs P255/70HRx16BSW |
|
| Type of wheels |
17" aluminum vs 7x16 chrome steel |
|
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)
