Comparison >>>
Cadillac SRX and Ford Explorer
What is Better Cadillac SRX or Ford Explorer?
Exterior
 |
 |
14 reasons to buy Cadillac SRX
| Engine and transmission | ||
| More engine power | 258 bhp vs 204 bhp 190 kw. vs 150 kw. |
21% or 54 bhp. More power of car = more top speed. |
| More torque | 339 nM vs 318 nM |
6% or 21 nM. More torque = faster acceleration. |
| Performance | ||
| Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph | 8.1 sec. vs 10.9 sec. | 2.8 sec. |
| More top speed | 125 mph vs 120 mph | 5 mph |
| Fuel consumption | ||
| Less fuel consumption (City) | 15 mpg vs 15.5 mpg | 3% or 0.5 mpg |
| Emissions | ||
| Less CO2 emissions | 197 g/mile vs 218 g/mile | 11% or 21 g/mile |
| Higher European emission standard | EURO 4 vs EURO 2 | 2 generations |
| Weight and capacity | ||
| More capacity of fuel tank | 76 liters vs 75.8 liters | 0% or 0.2 liters |
| More maximum allowable weight | 2725 kg vs 2530 kg | 7% or 195 kg |
| More maximum bearing capacity | 729 kg vs 450 kg | 38% or 279 kg |
| More maximum roof load | 100 kg vs 90 kg | 10% or 10 kg |
| Warranty | ||
| More painted surfaces warranty | 3 years vs 1 years | 67% or 2 years |
| Other specs | ||
| Less weight | 1996 kg vs 2080 kg | 104% or 2080 kg. Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc. |
| More seats | 7 vs 5 | 2 |
5 reasons to buy Ford Explorer
| Fuel consumption | ||
| Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) | 20.59 mpg vs 21.11 mpg | 3% or 0.52 mpg |
| Less fuel consumption (Highway) | 25.4 mpg vs 27.7 mpg | 9% or 2.3 mpg |
| Emissions | ||
| Less noise level | 72 dB vs 74 dB | 3% or 2 dB |
| Weight and capacity | ||
| More maximum towing weight with brakes | 2550 kg vs 2268 kg | 11% or 282 kg |
| Other specs | ||
| Smaller turning radius | 11.5 meters vs 12.1 meters | 5% or 0.6 meters |
Neutral reasons Cadillac SRX vs. Ford Explorer
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Engine speed (RPM) | 6500 RPM vs 5250 RPM |
19% or 1250 more rpms. |
| Engine capacity | 3564 cm3 vs 4008 cm3 | 11% or 444 cm3 less |
| Camshaft | DOHC vs SOHC | |
| Fuel supply | Distributor fuel injection vs Fuel injection | |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4950 mm vs 4813 mm | 3% or 137 mm longer |
| Width | 1845 mm vs 1874 mm | 2% or 29 mm narrower |
| Height | 1685 mm vs 1801 mm | 6% or 116 mm lower |
| Wheels and tires | ||
| Wheelbase | 2957 mm vs 2835 mm | 4% or 122 mm more |
| Front tires size | 235/65 R17 vs P255/70HRx16BSW | |
| Rear tires size | 225/60 R17 vs P255/70HRx16BSW | |
| Spare wheel | Compact vs P255/70HRx16BSW | |
| Type of wheels | 17" aluminum vs 7x16 chrome steel | |
Related:
- Cadillac SRX vs Ford Fiesta
- Cadillac SRX vs Ford Focus
- Cadillac SRX vs Ford Focus C-MAX
- Cadillac SRX vs Ford Fusion
- Cadillac SRX vs Ford Galaxy
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)