Last Update: Mar. 20, 2019, 5:04 a.m.
Home >>> >>> Chevrolet Blazer and Subaru E-Wagon

What is Better Chevrolet Blazer or Subaru E-Wagon?

Exterior

Chevrolet Blazer Subaru E-Wagon

8 reasons to buy Chevrolet Blazer

Engine and transmission
More cylinders 6 vs 4 2 more cylinders. The more cylinders = the less vibration and the engine runs more smoothly.
More engine power

193 bhp vs 54 bhp

142 kw. vs 39 kw.

72% or 139 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
More torque 338 nM vs 97 nM 71% or 241 nM. More torque = faster acceleration.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 10.1 sec. vs 17.20 sec. 7.1 sec.
More top speed 112 mph vs 80 mph 32 mph
Weight and capacity
More maximum allowable weight 2427 kg vs 1600 kg 34% or 827 kg
More maximum towing weight without brakes 454 kg vs 400 kg 12% or 54 kg
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2600 kg vs 700 kg 73% or 1900 kg

4 reasons to buy Subaru E-Wagon

Engine and transmission
More valves per cylinder 4 vs 2 2 more valves per cylinder. The more valves = the better combustion of the fuel.
Weight and capacity
More maximum bearing capacity 670 kg vs 512 kg 24% or 158 kg
Other specs
Less weight 930 kg vs 1915 kg 106% or 985 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 8.40 meters vs 12 meters 43% or 3.6 meters

Neutral reasons Chevrolet Blazer vs. Subaru E-Wagon

Engine and transmission
Engine speed (RPM) 4500 RPM vs 4600 RPM 2% or 100 less rpms.
Engine capacity 4300 cm3 vs 1189 cm3 72% or 3111 cm3 more
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 4 vs 5 1 less
Dimensions
Length 4639 mm vs 3525 mm 24% or 1114 mm shorter
Width 1763 mm vs 1415 mm 20% or 348 mm wider
Height 1606 mm vs 1925 mm 17% or 319 mm lower
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2718 mm vs 1885 mm 31% or 833 mm more
Front tires size P235/70 R15 vs 155R13
Rear tires size P235/70 R15 vs 155R13
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)