Last Update: Mar. 22, 2019, 5:39 a.m.
Sizes and Dimensions
Parts & Accessories
Home >>> >>> Chevrolet Captiva and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

What is Better Chevrolet Captiva or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?

Exterior

Chevrolet Captiva Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

2 reasons to buy Chevrolet Captiva

Emissions
Less CO2 emissions 119 g/mile vs 124 g/mile 4% or 5 g/mile
Weight and capacity
More maximum towing weight with brakes 2000 kg vs 1800 kg 10% or 200 kg

9 reasons to buy Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Engine and transmission
More engine power

236 bhp vs 148 bhp

vs 110 kw.

37% or 88 bhp. More power of car = more top speed.
Performance
Faster acceleration from 0 to 60 mph 7.1 sec. vs 10.8 sec. 3.7 sec.
More top speed 135 mph vs 114 mph 21 mph
Fuel consumption
Less fuel consumption (Combined cycle) 33.71 mpg vs 39.2 mpg 16% or 5.49 mpg
Emissions
Higher european emission standard EURO 5 vs EURO 4 1 generation
Weight and capacity
More minimum boot capacity 575 liters vs 465 liters 19% or 110 liters
More capacity of fuel tank 70 liters vs 65 liters 7% or 5 liters
Other specs
Less weight 1640 kg vs 1770 kg 8% or 130 kg Weight of the vehicle affects: fuel consumption, acceleration dynamic, braking distance, etc.
Less turning radius 11 meters vs 11.5 meters 5% or 0.5 meters

Neutral reasons Chevrolet Captiva vs. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Engine and transmission
Engine capacity 1991 cm3 vs 1999 cm3 0% or 8 cm3 less
Fuel supply COMMON RAIL vs Direct fuel injection with turbocharging
Turbocharging Yes vs Yes
Speeds 5 vs 6 1 less
Dimensions
Length 4635 mm vs 4365 mm 6% or 270 mm shorter
Width 1850 mm vs 2125 mm 13% or 275 mm narrower
Height 1720 mm vs 1635 mm 5% or 85 mm higher
Wheels and tires
Wheelbase 2705 mm vs 2660 mm 2% or 45 mm more
*Specs may vary depending on configurations and year of production(taken parameters of last released versions)